Video Streaming Protocols Comparison in Field Experiments for Aerial Teleoperation

As aerial robots evolve to perform complex tasks such as manipulation and visual inspection, maintaining the pilot at the center of decision-making is critical for mission safety and leveraging human expertise. A key enabler of this collaboration is reliable video streaming between the robot and the operator. This paper presents a comparative analysis of four video streaming protocols RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol), RTSP (Real-Time Streaming Protocol), SRT (Secure Reliable Transport), and ROSTCP (ROS Transport Control Protocol) based on extensive field experiments. The evaluation focuses on CPU usage, network throughput, latency, streaming quality, and packet integrity across varying distances. Tools such as iperf, ping, GStreamer, and Wireshark were employed for detailed performance measurements. Results reveal significant differences: SRT and RTP deliver superior network stability and resilience to packet loss, while RTSP and ROSTCP show advantages in CPU efficiency. These findings provide actionable insights for optimizing video streaming in aerial robotics, emphasizing the trade-offs and advantages of each protocol in real-world scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmerr64601.2025.10949937
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Video Streaming Protocols Comparison in Field Experiments for Aerial Teleoperation

Riccardo Franceschini, Julian Cayero Becerra, Matteo Fumagalli, Manuel Fernández
2 citations
Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
1.43
article

Video Streaming Protocols Comparison in Field Experiments for Aerial Teleoperation

Riccardo Franceschini, Julian Cayero Becerra, Matteo Fumagalli, Manuel Fernández
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As aerial robots evolve to perform complex tasks such as manipulation and visual inspection, maintaining the pilot at the center of decision-making is critical for mission safety and leveraging human expertise. A key enabler of this collaboration is reliable video streaming between the robot and the operator. This paper presents a comparative analysis of four video streaming protocols RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol), RTSP (Real-Time Streaming Protocol), SRT (Secure Reliable Transport), and ROSTCP (ROS Transport Control Protocol) based on extensive field experiments. The evaluation focuses on CPU usage, network throughput, latency, streaming quality, and packet integrity across varying distances. Tools such as iperf, ping, GStreamer, and Wireshark were employed for detailed performance measurements. Results reveal significant differences: SRT and RTP deliver superior network stability and resilience to packet loss, while RTSP and ROSTCP show advantages in CPU efficiency. These findings provide actionable insights for optimizing video streaming in aerial robotics, emphasizing the trade-offs and advantages of each protocol in real-world scenarios.

Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Video Streaming Protocols Comparison in Field Experiments for Aerial Teleoperation — Riccardo Franceschini, Julian Cayero Becerra, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS