A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties in Injection Moulding (IM), Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), and Arburg Plastic Freeforming (APF) Processes

This study explores the mechanical performance of polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) filaments fabricated using fused filament fabrication (FFF), Arburg plastic freeforming (APF), and injection moulding (IM). A series of controlled experiments, including differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMA), and mechanical tests, were conducted to evaluate the material's mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. The results highlight the influence of process parameters and material choice on the mechanical properties of PC/ABS components. The FFF samples exhibited the highest impact strength (up to 28.82 kJ/m²), attributed to porosity acting as a stress absorber under impact load. However, this same porosity led to a 9.14% and 19.27% reduction in flexural and tensile strength, respectively, compared to the APF samples, where stress concentration effects were more pronounced under flexural loads. APF's mechanical properties were comparable to those of IM, with the process achieving the highest tensile strength, highlighting its potential for producing robust PC/ABS samples. This study aims to provide valuable insight into the selection of additive manufacturing (AM) processes for PC/ABS components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070990
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties in Injection Moulding (IM), Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), and Arburg Plastic Freeforming (APF) Processes

Gavin Keane, Declan M. Devine, Caolan Jameson, Noel Gately
3 citations
Polymers
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
article

A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties in Injection Moulding (IM), Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), and Arburg Plastic Freeforming (APF) Processes

Gavin Keane, Declan M. Devine, Caolan Jameson, Noel Gately
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study explores the mechanical performance of polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) filaments fabricated using fused filament fabrication (FFF), Arburg plastic freeforming (APF), and injection moulding (IM). A series of controlled experiments, including differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMA), and mechanical tests, were conducted to evaluate the material's mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. The results highlight the influence of process parameters and material choice on the mechanical properties of PC/ABS components. The FFF samples exhibited the highest impact strength (up to 28.82 kJ/m²), attributed to porosity acting as a stress absorber under impact load. However, this same porosity led to a 9.14% and 19.27% reduction in flexural and tensile strength, respectively, compared to the APF samples, where stress concentration effects were more pronounced under flexural loads. APF's mechanical properties were comparable to those of IM, with the process achieving the highest tensile strength, highlighting its potential for producing robust PC/ABS samples. This study aims to provide valuable insight into the selection of additive manufacturing (AM) processes for PC/ABS components.

PolymersVol. 17(7)
Athlone Institute of Technology (IE), Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.