Comparison of Standard Ant Colony Optimization, Dijkstra and A* Algorithms for Path Planning of Robot in an Indoor Environment

The research topic of Path planning is extremely challenging area of concentration within the field of mobile robots. However, path planning algorithms for mobile robot tasks are contingent upon the environment and its level of complexity. This paper analyzes four distinct path planning methods for simulated indoor environment. The proposed algorithms include conventional Ant Colony methods, Ant System (AS), Ant Colony System (ACS), as well as standard methods Dijkstra and AStar (A*). We analyzed and examined these algorithms by employing various metrics/maps with complexity. The results indicate that the traditional path planning algorithm Dijkstra and A* approaches surpass the other ant colony techniques in terms of both computation time and path distance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmerr64601.2025.10949924
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Standard Ant Colony Optimization, Dijkstra and A* Algorithms for Path Planning of Robot in an Indoor Environment

Peter Nauth, Juan José Domínguez‐Jiménez, Anh Tong Ngoc Minh, Sudeep Sharan
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Comparison of Standard Ant Colony Optimization, Dijkstra and A* Algorithms for Path Planning of Robot in an Indoor Environment

Peter Nauth, Juan José Domínguez‐Jiménez, Anh Tong Ngoc Minh, Sudeep Sharan
article en

Abstract

The research topic of Path planning is extremely challenging area of concentration within the field of mobile robots. However, path planning algorithms for mobile robot tasks are contingent upon the environment and its level of complexity. This paper analyzes four distinct path planning methods for simulated indoor environment. The proposed algorithms include conventional Ant Colony methods, Ant System (AS), Ant Colony System (ACS), as well as standard methods Dijkstra and AStar (A*). We analyzed and examined these algorithms by employing various metrics/maps with complexity. The results indicate that the traditional path planning algorithm Dijkstra and A* approaches surpass the other ant colony techniques in terms of both computation time and path distance.

Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Universidad de Cádiz (ES), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Software (Spain) (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.