Identification of gaps in knowledge and professional practice in geriatric anorexia

Objective: To identify gaps in healthcare professionals’ understanding and management of geriatric anorexia. Methods: Mixed methods, including discussions with experts through focus-group interviews and a digital survey distributed to healthcare professionals. Results: A total of 192 healthcare professionals completed the survey. Of these, 65.1% acknowledged a uniform definition of geriatric anorexia, defining it as a reduction in appetite and/or food intake; 93.2% identified depression as the most significant risk factor, and 91.1%, cognitive changes or dementia; 64.9% of respondents expressed confidence in providing nutritional recommendations, 57.8% in suggesting physical activity and 81.8% in involving caregivers (family members) in supporting older adults with anorexia; 76% of clinicians assessed appetite during each visit; the tools most often used to screen older adults for appetite loss included informal clinical interview (52.6%) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (40.1%); management focused primarily on recommending oral nutritional supplements (75%) and prescribing nutritional counseling (74.5%). Conclusion: Our findings highlight the challenges in caring for older adults with or at risk of geriatric anorexia. Identifying differences in practices among healthcare professionals and within healthcare teams can inform future healthcare education efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e00000259_en
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of gaps in knowledge and professional practice in geriatric anorexia

Stefan D. Anker, Iván Aprahamian, Tatiana Klompenhouwer, Sandra María Lima Ribeiro et al.
Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Identification of gaps in knowledge and professional practice in geriatric anorexia

Stefan D. Anker, Iván Aprahamian, Tatiana Klompenhouwer, Sandra María Lima Ribeiro, Ricardo Jauregui, John E. Morley, Luis Olmos Gutiérrez, Mauricio Lorca, Esperanza Araya
article en

Abstract

Objective: To identify gaps in healthcare professionals’ understanding and management of geriatric anorexia. Methods: Mixed methods, including discussions with experts through focus-group interviews and a digital survey distributed to healthcare professionals. Results: A total of 192 healthcare professionals completed the survey. Of these, 65.1% acknowledged a uniform definition of geriatric anorexia, defining it as a reduction in appetite and/or food intake; 93.2% identified depression as the most significant risk factor, and 91.1%, cognitive changes or dementia; 64.9% of respondents expressed confidence in providing nutritional recommendations, 57.8% in suggesting physical activity and 81.8% in involving caregivers (family members) in supporting older adults with anorexia; 76% of clinicians assessed appetite during each visit; the tools most often used to screen older adults for appetite loss included informal clinical interview (52.6%) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (40.1%); management focused primarily on recommending oral nutritional supplements (75%) and prescribing nutritional counseling (74.5%). Conclusion: Our findings highlight the challenges in caring for older adults with or at risk of geriatric anorexia. Identifying differences in practices among healthcare professionals and within healthcare teams can inform future healthcare education efforts.

Geriatrics Gerontology and AgingVol. 19
Austral University of Chile (CL), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), San Sebastián University (CL), UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels (BE), Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pediatria (MX), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.