The Corporate Transparency Act or an Expanded Customer Due Diligence Rule

In 2021, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit activities by requiring certain business entities to report personal information about the individuals who own or control the business and those who helped create or register the business. The reported information will be held in a federal database controlled by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and can be disclosed upon request by domestic and foreign governmental agencies and financial institutions. While the motivation behind the CTA is warranted due to the recent uncovering of illegal shell companies and reports of poor governmental policies and procedures, there are numerous issues with how the CTA is currently written. The definitions are overly broad and confusing to the average business owner and leave the door open for complex organizational structures to be exempt from compliance. Further, the CTA may intrude on many constitutional rights, such as the freedom of association, the right to privacy, and state sovereignty from the federal government. A potential solution to fix these issues would be to expand the already well-established Customer Due Diligence Rule (“CDD Rule”) to include the new CTA requirements. The CDD Rule requires financial institutions to collect similar beneficial ownership information from companies when the companies go to open a bank account. By requiring the financial institutions to collect and retain the beneficial ownership information from the companies, the burdens of compliance and monitoring shift from the individual business owners to the financial institutions. The financial institutions likely have more capital and resources to understand and comply with these complex requirements. In addition, by moving the relationship away from the federal government and to the financial institutions, the potential constitutional issues could vanish.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas A&M law review arguendo.
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37419/lr.v12.arg.7
Primary Topic
Business Law and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Corporate Transparency Act or an Expanded Customer Due Diligence Rule

Tyler Scattolini
Texas A&M law review arguendo.
Business Law and Ethics
article

The Corporate Transparency Act or an Expanded Customer Due Diligence Rule

Tyler Scattolini
article en

Abstract

In 2021, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit activities by requiring certain business entities to report personal information about the individuals who own or control the business and those who helped create or register the business. The reported information will be held in a federal database controlled by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and can be disclosed upon request by domestic and foreign governmental agencies and financial institutions. While the motivation behind the CTA is warranted due to the recent uncovering of illegal shell companies and reports of poor governmental policies and procedures, there are numerous issues with how the CTA is currently written. The definitions are overly broad and confusing to the average business owner and leave the door open for complex organizational structures to be exempt from compliance. Further, the CTA may intrude on many constitutional rights, such as the freedom of association, the right to privacy, and state sovereignty from the federal government. A potential solution to fix these issues would be to expand the already well-established Customer Due Diligence Rule (“CDD Rule”) to include the new CTA requirements. The CDD Rule requires financial institutions to collect similar beneficial ownership information from companies when the companies go to open a bank account. By requiring the financial institutions to collect and retain the beneficial ownership information from the companies, the burdens of compliance and monitoring shift from the individual business owners to the financial institutions. The financial institutions likely have more capital and resources to understand and comply with these complex requirements. In addition, by moving the relationship away from the federal government and to the financial institutions, the potential constitutional issues could vanish.

Texas A&M law review arguendo.Vol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Business Law and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.