Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World

Abstract This essay examines the Romanovs’ diplomatic correspondence with the Mughal and Safavid courts, focusing on the Muscovite court’s persistent use of Turkic in written communications. The remarkable tenacity of the Muscovite court in maintaining written communication in Turkic with most Islamic royal courts (even those that primarily used Persian) was primarily due not to inertia or tribute to long-standing tradition, but to the distinct role occupied in the Muscovite foreign chancellery ( Posol’skii prikaz ) by Turkographic scribes—translators and dragomans mostly of the Tatar origin—whose principal remit was providing language assistance for diplomatic correspondence. By the second half of the seventeenth century, these Turkic language translators had organized themselves into family guilds, playing a pivotal role in establishing Turkic as the dominant language for diplomatic correspondence. Once entrenched in Muscovite bureaucratic practices, this reliance on Turkic persisted—even in situations where its use might appear to have been counterintuitive or at odds with the strategic logic of a specific diplomatic mission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341643
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World

Ulfat Abdurasulov
1 citations
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Islamic Studies and History
8.52
article

Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World

Ulfat Abdurasulov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This essay examines the Romanovs’ diplomatic correspondence with the Mughal and Safavid courts, focusing on the Muscovite court’s persistent use of Turkic in written communications. The remarkable tenacity of the Muscovite court in maintaining written communication in Turkic with most Islamic royal courts (even those that primarily used Persian) was primarily due not to inertia or tribute to long-standing tradition, but to the distinct role occupied in the Muscovite foreign chancellery ( Posol’skii prikaz ) by Turkographic scribes—translators and dragomans mostly of the Tatar origin—whose principal remit was providing language assistance for diplomatic correspondence. By the second half of the seventeenth century, these Turkic language translators had organized themselves into family guilds, playing a pivotal role in establishing Turkic as the dominant language for diplomatic correspondence. Once entrenched in Muscovite bureaucratic practices, this reliance on Turkic persisted—even in situations where its use might appear to have been counterintuitive or at odds with the strategic logic of a specific diplomatic mission.

Journal of the Economic and Social History of the OrientVol. 68(3-4)
Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Islamic Studies and History
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World — Ulfat Abdurasulov · Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS