Coproducing futures: A three‐mode heuristic for reflexive practice toward sustainability

Abstract Coproduction is commonly used as an action‐oriented practice to collaboratively produce knowledge for different purposes, including supporting institutional change to navigate uncertainty and complexity while enabling pathways to sustainable futures. Futures thinking and related tools are also used to conceive new possibilities or alternative futures and increase collective understanding of change processes. Yet, despite common themes of change, uncertainty, and transformation being strongly related to how we envision and imagine the future, there has been relatively little cross‐fertilization between coproduction and futures thinking, specifically, to understand how the explicit use of the latter can facilitate sustainability transformations. A fundamental question remains about how to facilitate reflexivity and critical thinking across multiple actors, knowledge systems, and values, to shape coherent imaginaries of just and sustainable futures. This article explores the potential of a heuristic relating three modes of futures thinking (predictive, anticipatory, and speculative) and their interconnections to strengthen reflexive and future‐oriented practices in coproduction. We document insights from coproduction researchers and practitioners applying these three modes of futures thinking in their work and how these support reflexive practices. We discuss gaps and opportunities for more future‐oriented coproduction that increase collective awareness and responsible stewardship of nature. Our heuristic can enable critical thinking from researchers and practitioners involved in the pursuit of sustainability transformations to better integrate science, policy, and community engagement to identify innovative ways to address power imbalances and a more proactive engagement with the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth stewardship.
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eas2.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coproducing futures: A three‐mode heuristic for reflexive practice toward sustainability

Stefanos Xenarios, Federico Davila, Jessica Cheok, Naomi Carrard et al.
1 citations
Earth stewardship.
Sustainability in Higher Education
8.93
article

Coproducing futures: A three‐mode heuristic for reflexive practice toward sustainability

Stefanos Xenarios, Federico Davila, Jessica Cheok, Naomi Carrard, Mark Stafford‐Smith, Claudia Múnera‐Roldán, Peat Leith, Russell Warman, Carina Wyborn, Leonie Pearson, Lorrae van Kerkhoff, Carla Alexandra, Emma Ligtermoet, Nicky Grigg, Daniel J. Rogers, Nina Frankowski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Coproduction is commonly used as an action‐oriented practice to collaboratively produce knowledge for different purposes, including supporting institutional change to navigate uncertainty and complexity while enabling pathways to sustainable futures. Futures thinking and related tools are also used to conceive new possibilities or alternative futures and increase collective understanding of change processes. Yet, despite common themes of change, uncertainty, and transformation being strongly related to how we envision and imagine the future, there has been relatively little cross‐fertilization between coproduction and futures thinking, specifically, to understand how the explicit use of the latter can facilitate sustainability transformations. A fundamental question remains about how to facilitate reflexivity and critical thinking across multiple actors, knowledge systems, and values, to shape coherent imaginaries of just and sustainable futures. This article explores the potential of a heuristic relating three modes of futures thinking (predictive, anticipatory, and speculative) and their interconnections to strengthen reflexive and future‐oriented practices in coproduction. We document insights from coproduction researchers and practitioners applying these three modes of futures thinking in their work and how these support reflexive practices. We discuss gaps and opportunities for more future‐oriented coproduction that increase collective awareness and responsible stewardship of nature. Our heuristic can enable critical thinking from researchers and practitioners involved in the pursuit of sustainability transformations to better integrate science, policy, and community engagement to identify innovative ways to address power imbalances and a more proactive engagement with the future.

Earth stewardship.Vol. 2(2)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Australian National University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), University of Canberra (AU), ACT Government (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainability in Higher Education
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.