Influence of Time‐Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States

Abstract Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a driver of evaporative demand and correlates strongly with wildfire extent in the western United States (WUS). Vapor pressure deficit is the difference between saturation vapor pressure ( e s ) and actual vapor pressure ( e a ). Because e s increases nonlinearly with temperature, calculations of time‐averaged VPD vary depending on the frequency of temperature measurements and how e a is calculated, potentially limiting our understanding of fire‐climate relationships. We calculate eight versions of monthly VPD across the WUS and assess their differences. Monthly VPDs calculated from daily data are 2%–6% higher, and more accurate, than when calculated from monthly data. Using daily maximum and minimum temperature, instead of mean, increases VPD by ∼20%, but can overestimate true values depending on how e a is calculated. These differences do not meaningfully impact correlations with annual wildfire area, however, suggesting our understanding of historical fire‐VPD relations is not very sensitive to how VPD is calculated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl113708
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Time‐Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States

Qian He, Miriam R. Johnston, Caroline S. Juang, Park Williams et al.
3 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Fire effects on ecosystems
3.32
article

Influence of Time‐Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States

Qian He, Miriam R. Johnston, Caroline S. Juang, Park Williams, Bowen Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a driver of evaporative demand and correlates strongly with wildfire extent in the western United States (WUS). Vapor pressure deficit is the difference between saturation vapor pressure ( e s ) and actual vapor pressure ( e a ). Because e s increases nonlinearly with temperature, calculations of time‐averaged VPD vary depending on the frequency of temperature measurements and how e a is calculated, potentially limiting our understanding of fire‐climate relationships. We calculate eight versions of monthly VPD across the WUS and assess their differences. Monthly VPDs calculated from daily data are 2%–6% higher, and more accurate, than when calculated from monthly data. Using daily maximum and minimum temperature, instead of mean, increases VPD by ∼20%, but can overestimate true values depending on how e a is calculated. These differences do not meaningfully impact correlations with annual wildfire area, however, suggesting our understanding of historical fire‐VPD relations is not very sensitive to how VPD is calculated.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(7)
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Columbia University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fire effects on ecosystems
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.