Knowledge exchange in disaster risk management: A comparative study between Indonesia and USA

Abstract The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami affected Indonesia with massive devastation and suffering. It ignited the largest international humanitarian response and recovery in history. Academicians, responders, civil servants, teachers, and all professions were awakened to the urgency of disaster risk reduction, mitigation, preparedness, and readiness. Indonesia then instituted disaster management law, established national, provincial, and local disaster management organizations, and started developing a disaster management workforce. The United States of America (USA) supported Indonesia’s 2004 tsunami response and recovery and continues to assist in capabilities enhancement. This research aims to explore how knowledge exchange through training, education, policy improvement, system development, and organizational management contributes to the whole society’s capacity. Our method includes a literature review, focus group discussions, and site visits to explore collaborations between governments, private sectors, civil societies, non-governmental organizations, and regular citizens to generate improved disaster preparedness and readiness. Recent US-Indonesia comparative study missions offer lessons and recommendations for urban planning and green infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and readiness progression. Major findings through comparative lessons gained include the importance of developing incident management assistance team, supplemental response team, community emergency response team, regional office, biochemical hazard training, national interagency fire management, hazard and social vulnerability risk mapping, and incident workforce academy. New knowledge enrichment brings excitement and expectations, requiring competent human resource, financial, and policy investments. Capacity building must increase equity and resilience planning for vulnerable communities across the islands as Indonesia increases its regional disaster response contribution. Future implications would include prioritized efforts for short, medium, and long-term transformation in improving disaster management in Indonesia and continuing to collaborate with the USA in nurturing sustainability and resilience despite complex challenges in disaster risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1479/1/012058
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge exchange in disaster risk management: A comparative study between Indonesia and USA

Charles Ham, Eric Yamashita, Karl Kim, Dody Ruswandi et al.
1 citations
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.43
article

Knowledge exchange in disaster risk management: A comparative study between Indonesia and USA

Charles Ham, Eric Yamashita, Karl Kim, Dody Ruswandi, Rustian, Ditto Rizki Samudra, Andrew John Henry Duncan, Nanang Emanuel Suharto, Dian Cahayani Subagio, Kheriawan, Ayu Setiadewi, Johan Fredi Pakpahan, Anggita Wulandari Poerwanto, Dian Nur Wijayanti, Susilastuti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami affected Indonesia with massive devastation and suffering. It ignited the largest international humanitarian response and recovery in history. Academicians, responders, civil servants, teachers, and all professions were awakened to the urgency of disaster risk reduction, mitigation, preparedness, and readiness. Indonesia then instituted disaster management law, established national, provincial, and local disaster management organizations, and started developing a disaster management workforce. The United States of America (USA) supported Indonesia’s 2004 tsunami response and recovery and continues to assist in capabilities enhancement. This research aims to explore how knowledge exchange through training, education, policy improvement, system development, and organizational management contributes to the whole society’s capacity. Our method includes a literature review, focus group discussions, and site visits to explore collaborations between governments, private sectors, civil societies, non-governmental organizations, and regular citizens to generate improved disaster preparedness and readiness. Recent US-Indonesia comparative study missions offer lessons and recommendations for urban planning and green infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and readiness progression. Major findings through comparative lessons gained include the importance of developing incident management assistance team, supplemental response team, community emergency response team, regional office, biochemical hazard training, national interagency fire management, hazard and social vulnerability risk mapping, and incident workforce academy. New knowledge enrichment brings excitement and expectations, requiring competent human resource, financial, and policy investments. Capacity building must increase equity and resilience planning for vulnerable communities across the islands as Indonesia increases its regional disaster response contribution. Future implications would include prioritized efforts for short, medium, and long-term transformation in improving disaster management in Indonesia and continuing to collaborate with the USA in nurturing sustainability and resilience despite complex challenges in disaster risk management.

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceVol. 1479(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.