Point of View and Embodiment Revisited

Prompted by the popularity of contemporary autofiction, this article revisits instances of authorial self-reference in eighteenth-century fiction. These, the author argues, are better understood, like their contemporary counterparts, as vehicles of and reflections upon experiences of embodiment rather than as problems of reference per se. Indeed, brief examples of both first- and third-person expressions of the embodiment of narrators, characters, readers, and authors suggest that point of view may not be the settled matter of fictional form that narrative theory and the history of the novel have led us to suppose—at least in the eighteenth century. Point of view is worth revisiting as independent of reference, which dominates accounts of fictionality, because it registers and shapes the more-than- and less-than-human experience of fiction then as well as now, even as the conditions for reading and writing have changed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.2023-0057
Primary Topic
French Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Point of View and Embodiment Revisited

Michael Frank
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
French Literature and Criticism
article

Point of View and Embodiment Revisited

Michael Frank
article en

Abstract

Prompted by the popularity of contemporary autofiction, this article revisits instances of authorial self-reference in eighteenth-century fiction. These, the author argues, are better understood, like their contemporary counterparts, as vehicles of and reflections upon experiences of embodiment rather than as problems of reference per se. Indeed, brief examples of both first- and third-person expressions of the embodiment of narrators, characters, readers, and authors suggest that point of view may not be the settled matter of fictional form that narrative theory and the history of the novel have led us to suppose—at least in the eighteenth century. Point of view is worth revisiting as independent of reference, which dominates accounts of fictionality, because it registers and shapes the more-than- and less-than-human experience of fiction then as well as now, even as the conditions for reading and writing have changed.

Eighteenth-Century FictionVol. 37(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
French Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.