What Is Eighteenth-Century <i>Xiaoshuo</i>?

This article responds to the question, “What is eighteenth-century fiction?” with a focus on Chinese fiction. It begins with an overview of eighteenth-century Chinese fiction and a deeper reading of the explicit metafictionality of China’s most famous eighteenth-century novel, Story of the Stone (also known as Dream of the Red Chamber). Then it critically interrogates the assumed equivalency between the English term fiction and the Chinese term xiaoshuo through a historical overview of the unequal literary and linguistic engagements between Europe and China. The article concludes that “we can neither reduce Stone to fiction nor deny it the status of fiction” and calls for a way of reading Chinese literary works in translation without essentializing either sameness or difference, one that acknowledges the dangers and distinctions involved yet insists on communicability across differences—one based first in the pleasure of reading for its own sake.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.2023-0054
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is Eighteenth-Century Xiaoshuo?

Jessica Dvorak Moyer
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
Chinese history and philosophy
article

What Is Eighteenth-Century Xiaoshuo?

Jessica Dvorak Moyer
article en

Abstract

This article responds to the question, “What is eighteenth-century fiction?” with a focus on Chinese fiction. It begins with an overview of eighteenth-century Chinese fiction and a deeper reading of the explicit metafictionality of China’s most famous eighteenth-century novel, Story of the Stone (also known as Dream of the Red Chamber). Then it critically interrogates the assumed equivalency between the English term fiction and the Chinese term xiaoshuo through a historical overview of the unequal literary and linguistic engagements between Europe and China. The article concludes that “we can neither reduce Stone to fiction nor deny it the status of fiction” and calls for a way of reading Chinese literary works in translation without essentializing either sameness or difference, one that acknowledges the dangers and distinctions involved yet insists on communicability across differences—one based first in the pleasure of reading for its own sake.

Eighteenth-Century FictionVol. 37(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.