Evaluation of the Extinguishing Efficiency of Eco-Friendly Soap-Based Media Against Prolonged Simulated Peat Fires

Peat fires generate significant greenhouse gas emissions, thereby posing considerable environmental challenges arising from smoke pollution, health hazards, and ecological impacts. Water alone is inefficient for extinguishing peat fires because it cannot immediately penetrate the soil. Therefore, firefighting agents with high penetrative capabilities are used. This study evaluated an environmentally friendly soap-based firefighting agent against peat fires in Palangka Raya, Indonesia. A 1.5 m × 1.5 m peat area was burned for 24 h to simulate a peat fire. The fire was then extinguished either with groundwater or a 1 vol.% soap-based firefighting agent solution. With groundwater, the volumes required to extinguish the fire were 16.0 and 23.9 L/m2, whereas with the soap-based solution, the volumes used were 3.8 and 7.4 L/m2. Furthermore, the time to extinguish the fire with the soap-based solution was approximately one-third of the requirement when using water alone. The soap-based firefighting agent was proven to be more effective against peat fires than water alone, reducing both the amount of agent used and the time required for extinguishing the fire. Given the increased severity of fires in recent years, this agent can facilitate the efficient management of peat fires.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8040151
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Extinguishing Efficiency of Eco-Friendly Soap-Based Media Against Prolonged Simulated Peat Fires

Kitso Kusin, Salampak Dohong, Kazuya Uezu, Takahide Kanyama et al.
Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Evaluation of the Extinguishing Efficiency of Eco-Friendly Soap-Based Media Against Prolonged Simulated Peat Fires

Kitso Kusin, Salampak Dohong, Kazuya Uezu, Takahide Kanyama, Adi Jaya, Takayoshi Kawahara
article en

Abstract

Peat fires generate significant greenhouse gas emissions, thereby posing considerable environmental challenges arising from smoke pollution, health hazards, and ecological impacts. Water alone is inefficient for extinguishing peat fires because it cannot immediately penetrate the soil. Therefore, firefighting agents with high penetrative capabilities are used. This study evaluated an environmentally friendly soap-based firefighting agent against peat fires in Palangka Raya, Indonesia. A 1.5 m × 1.5 m peat area was burned for 24 h to simulate a peat fire. The fire was then extinguished either with groundwater or a 1 vol.% soap-based firefighting agent solution. With groundwater, the volumes required to extinguish the fire were 16.0 and 23.9 L/m2, whereas with the soap-based solution, the volumes used were 3.8 and 7.4 L/m2. Furthermore, the time to extinguish the fire with the soap-based solution was approximately one-third of the requirement when using water alone. The soap-based firefighting agent was proven to be more effective against peat fires than water alone, reducing both the amount of agent used and the time required for extinguishing the fire. Given the increased severity of fires in recent years, this agent can facilitate the efficient management of peat fires.

FireVol. 8(4)
University of Palangka Raya (ID), The University of Kitakyushu (JP)
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.