Comparison of Models for Missing Data Imputation in PM-2.5 Measurement Data

The accurate monitoring and analysis of PM-2.5 are critical for improving air quality and formulating public health policies. However, environmental data often contain missing values due to equipment failures, data collection errors, or extreme weather conditions, which can hinder reliable analysis and predictions. This study evaluates the performance of various missing data imputation methods for PM-2.5 data in Seoul, Korea, using scenarios with artificially generated missing values during high- and low-concentration periods. The methods compared include FFILL, KNN, MICE, SARIMAX, DNN, and LSTM. The results indicate that KNN consistently achieved stable and balanced performance across different temporal intervals, with an RMSE of 5.65, 9.14, and 9.71 for 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h intervals, respectively. FFILL demonstrated superior performance for short intervals (RMSE 4.76 for 6 h) but showed significant limitations as intervals lengthened. SARIMAX performed well in long-term scenarios, with an RMSE of 9.37 for 24 h intervals, but required higher computational complexity. Conversely, deep learning models such as DNN and LSTM underperformed, highlighting the need for further optimization for time-series data. This study highlights the practicality of KNN as the most effective method for addressing missing PM-2.5 data in mid- to long-term applications due to its simplicity and efficiency. These findings provide valuable insights into the selection of imputation methods for environmental data analysis, contributing to the enhancement of data reliability and the development of effective air quality management policies.