What Background Is and Is Not in Defoe and Richardson

This essay attempts to articulate some distinctive features of the use of background in the fictions of Daniel Defoe and Samuel Richardson. To take up these features by reference to the notions of “description” and “setting” would be to emphasize the relative lack or imperfection of these features in comparison to the more “developed” nineteenth-century prototypes. Instead, the essay proposes using the framework of “background,” which can help us to consider eighteenth-century fictions on their own terms. The essay moves between some things that background “is” and some things background “is not” in these works to arrive at more refined, although still quite general, characterizations of these fictions’ “amplitude,” “depth,” and arrangement of “foreground” and “background.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.2023-0067
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Background Is and Is Not in Defoe and Richardson

Thomas Manganaro
Eighteenth-Century Fiction
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

What Background Is and Is Not in Defoe and Richardson

Thomas Manganaro
article en

Abstract

This essay attempts to articulate some distinctive features of the use of background in the fictions of Daniel Defoe and Samuel Richardson. To take up these features by reference to the notions of “description” and “setting” would be to emphasize the relative lack or imperfection of these features in comparison to the more “developed” nineteenth-century prototypes. Instead, the essay proposes using the framework of “background,” which can help us to consider eighteenth-century fictions on their own terms. The essay moves between some things that background “is” and some things background “is not” in these works to arrive at more refined, although still quite general, characterizations of these fictions’ “amplitude,” “depth,” and arrangement of “foreground” and “background.”

Eighteenth-Century FictionVol. 37(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.