Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Sexual Function After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

<b>Aim</b>: In our study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the surgical parameters of patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy and their effects on the development of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and sexual function one year later. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This retrospective and comparative study involved a review of medical records for 42 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign conditions and 42 patients who underwent hysterectomy using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) at our clinic between January 2023 and January 2024. Evaluations of preoperative and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function were conducted, and the anatomical and functional outcomes of both surgical methods were compared. <b>Results</b>: In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age (<i>p</i> < 0.299), BMI (<i>p</i> < 0.819), parity (<i>p</i> < 0.615), surgical indications and menopausal status (<i>p</i> < 0.535) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The vNOTES method was found to be significantly shorter than TLH in terms of surgical time (vNOTES: 58 min, TLH: 80 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two methods in terms of preoperative and postoperative hematocrit values, hospital stay and FSFI scores (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Among the POP-Q parameters, a significant difference was observed only in the Aa parameter in favor of the vNOTES method (<i>p</i> < 0.003). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our study, the vNOTES method provided a shorter surgical time and better anterior vaginal support compared to TLH, but both methods offered similar results in terms of sexual function. More comprehensive studies are needed to clarify the long-term effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082590
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Sexual Function After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Sedat Akgöl, İhsan Bağlı, Behzat Can, Cengiz Şanlı et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
5.00
article

Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Sexual Function After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Sedat Akgöl, İhsan Bağlı, Behzat Can, Cengiz Şanlı, Selamı Erdem, Salih Burçin Kavak, Mesut Bala, Cihan Bademkıran, Mehmet Obut, Süleyman Cemil Oğlak, Mesut Ali Halisçelik, Serhat Ege, Kevser Arkan, Ali Deniz Erkmen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Aim</b>: In our study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the surgical parameters of patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy and their effects on the development of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and sexual function one year later. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This retrospective and comparative study involved a review of medical records for 42 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign conditions and 42 patients who underwent hysterectomy using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) at our clinic between January 2023 and January 2024. Evaluations of preoperative and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function were conducted, and the anatomical and functional outcomes of both surgical methods were compared. <b>Results</b>: In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age (<i>p</i> < 0.299), BMI (<i>p</i> < 0.819), parity (<i>p</i> < 0.615), surgical indications and menopausal status (<i>p</i> < 0.535) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The vNOTES method was found to be significantly shorter than TLH in terms of surgical time (vNOTES: 58 min, TLH: 80 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two methods in terms of preoperative and postoperative hematocrit values, hospital stay and FSFI scores (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Among the POP-Q parameters, a significant difference was observed only in the Aa parameter in favor of the vNOTES method (<i>p</i> < 0.003). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our study, the vNOTES method provided a shorter surgical time and better anterior vaginal support compared to TLH, but both methods offered similar results in terms of sexual function. More comprehensive studies are needed to clarify the long-term effects.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
Dicle University (TR), Fırat University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
5.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.