A comparative analysis of option pricing models: Black–Scholes, Bachelier, and artificial neural networks

Abstract Practitioners and academics alike have applied the Black–Scholes model when pricing options practically since its introduction in 1973. The COVID-19 pandemic and the oil futures price crash of April 2020 caused major markets to briefly switch to the less widely known Bachelier model to price derivatives, as the model allows for negative strikes on the underlying. This study evaluates the predictive ability and accuracy of the Bachelier model and the Black–Scholes model when pricing European call options on the Standard & Poor’s 500 index using five volatility estimation methods. Moreover, it compares the forecasts of the two parameterized models to a deep feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) which is also used to price such options. Overall, the ANN is statistically superior in its predictive ability relative to both parameterized models, and there is no statistical difference in predictive ability between the Black–Scholes and Bachelier models. These results are of relevance to both academics and participants in the options markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Management
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-025-00160-0
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of option pricing models: Black–Scholes, Bachelier, and artificial neural networks

E.M. Gross, Francois Toerien, Ryan G. Kruger
Risk Management
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

A comparative analysis of option pricing models: Black–Scholes, Bachelier, and artificial neural networks

E.M. Gross, Francois Toerien, Ryan G. Kruger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Practitioners and academics alike have applied the Black–Scholes model when pricing options practically since its introduction in 1973. The COVID-19 pandemic and the oil futures price crash of April 2020 caused major markets to briefly switch to the less widely known Bachelier model to price derivatives, as the model allows for negative strikes on the underlying. This study evaluates the predictive ability and accuracy of the Bachelier model and the Black–Scholes model when pricing European call options on the Standard & Poor’s 500 index using five volatility estimation methods. Moreover, it compares the forecasts of the two parameterized models to a deep feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) which is also used to price such options. Overall, the ANN is statistically superior in its predictive ability relative to both parameterized models, and there is no statistical difference in predictive ability between the Black–Scholes and Bachelier models. These results are of relevance to both academics and participants in the options markets.

Risk ManagementVol. 27(2)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative analysis of option pricing models: Black–Scholes, Bachelier, and artificial neural networks — E.M. Gross, Francois Toerien, et al. · Risk Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS