Anomaly Detection in Robot Applications: Comparison of Rule-Based and Machine Learning Methods

The increasing use of robot applications in various industries requires close monitoring and management of the data generated by these systems. Therefore, it is essential to implement a monitoring system that identifies and reports abnormal situations in robots. The literature differentiates between rule-based and machine learning methods. Rule-based approaches rely on predefined rules to detect deviations from expected behavior. In contrast, machine learning algorithms acquire the ability to learn patterns on their own. This paper evaluates both approaches to determine whether machine learning algorithms can replace or enhance rule-based methods. The evaluation employs an actual production scenario that deals with three induced anomalies: Additional weight, drop of the manipulated object, and reduced speed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/crc63701.2024.10949892
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anomaly Detection in Robot Applications: Comparison of Rule-Based and Machine Learning Methods

Bernhard Reiterer, Christoph G. Schuetz, Michael Rathmair, Mara Vukadinovic
2 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.69
article

Anomaly Detection in Robot Applications: Comparison of Rule-Based and Machine Learning Methods

Bernhard Reiterer, Christoph G. Schuetz, Michael Rathmair, Mara Vukadinovic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The increasing use of robot applications in various industries requires close monitoring and management of the data generated by these systems. Therefore, it is essential to implement a monitoring system that identifies and reports abnormal situations in robots. The literature differentiates between rule-based and machine learning methods. Rule-based approaches rely on predefined rules to detect deviations from expected behavior. In contrast, machine learning algorithms acquire the ability to learn patterns on their own. This paper evaluates both approaches to determine whether machine learning algorithms can replace or enhance rule-based methods. The evaluation employs an actual production scenario that deals with three induced anomalies: Additional weight, drop of the manipulated object, and reduced speed.

Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Joanneum Research (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.