Machine Versus Human Intelligence: an Illustration from the CSES Problem Set

Following the release of CHATGPT in November 2022, both textual and visual LLMs evolved a long way. Several comments have been made by experts on the expertise and intelligence possessed by these Large Language Models; Amongst all, the contest between Human and Machine Intelligence is that discussion that catches great heights. This research focuses on the analytical and reasoning abilities of LLMs and further compares them to those of Human Intelligence. As a benchmark for the same, the CSES Problem Set, a well-structured set of algorithmic problems, touches a wide spectrum of computational syllabi, like Data Structures, Mathematics, Decision Theory, etc. Our analysis of the contrast in abilities leads to the conclusion that LLMs need a long way to go, and thus LLM researchers rather than modeling more and more visually appealing LLMs (like Sora, Dall-e, etc.) should focus more on the abilities of the existing textual models like CHATGPT. Our research shows that the Machine Intelligence is ≈ 46 % lower than that of the Human Intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/globalaisummit62156.2024.10947788
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Versus Human Intelligence: an Illustration from the CSES Problem Set

Pijush Kanti Kumar, Anurag Dutta, Soubhik Ghosh, Padmanavan Kumar et al.
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

Machine Versus Human Intelligence: an Illustration from the CSES Problem Set

Pijush Kanti Kumar, Anurag Dutta, Soubhik Ghosh, Padmanavan Kumar, Samrat Ray, K. Lakshmanan
article en

Abstract

Following the release of CHATGPT in November 2022, both textual and visual LLMs evolved a long way. Several comments have been made by experts on the expertise and intelligence possessed by these Large Language Models; Amongst all, the contest between Human and Machine Intelligence is that discussion that catches great heights. This research focuses on the analytical and reasoning abilities of LLMs and further compares them to those of Human Intelligence. As a benchmark for the same, the CSES Problem Set, a well-structured set of algorithmic problems, touches a wide spectrum of computational syllabi, like Data Structures, Mathematics, Decision Theory, etc. Our analysis of the contrast in abilities leads to the conclusion that LLMs need a long way to go, and thus LLM researchers rather than modeling more and more visually appealing LLMs (like Sora, Dall-e, etc.) should focus more on the abilities of the existing textual models like CHATGPT. Our research shows that the Machine Intelligence is ≈ 46 % lower than that of the Human Intelligence.

Nagaland University (IN), KIIT University (IN), Serampore College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Versus Human Intelligence: an Illustration from the CSES Problem Set — Pijush Kanti Kumar, Anurag Dutta, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS