Initial experience with augmented reality in planning renal access for PCNL

Achieving renal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy is challenging, with a complication rate of 10-20%. This study aims to assess a novel technique for planning access to the renal collecting system using augmented reality (AR). Using Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine software (DICOM 2-print), we generated 3-dimensional (3D) models of patients with different types of kidney stones (staghorn, lower pole, and pelvic stones) who underwent PCNL between 2018 and 2022. After viewing the patient's CT scans, surgeons explored the anatomical models using an AR system with a stereoscopic 3D lens array display. Using questionnaires, we quantitatively estimated the model's contribution on a scale of "1" ("poor") to "5" ("excellent") to the surgeon's understanding of stone location, patient anatomy, and ease of access compared to 2D CT imaging. A total of 38 questionnaires were completed by 13 urologists. Estimating renal location, renal pelvis, and stone mass were better demonstrated by AR (5 vs. 4, p < 0.001). The orientation of adjacent organs was better understood using AR (5 vs. 4, p = 0.004). In 86.8% of cases, surgeons preferred using AR models both before and during surgery, with 69.2% suggesting that AR could enhance procedural safety. The time frames for testing the models differed between senior and junior practitioners (p = 0.016) and were significantly reduced with model experience (p < 0.001). When comparing CT to 3D imaging, AR models provide a better understating of stone location, patient anatomy, and route of access to the collecting system. Further research is required to implement this innovative technique preoperatively and intra-operatively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urolithiasis
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01730-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial experience with augmented reality in planning renal access for PCNL

Dorit E. Zilberman, Nir Kleinmann, Oliana Vazhgovsky, Shai Tejman‐Yarden et al.
1 citations
Urolithiasis
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
1.52
article

Initial experience with augmented reality in planning renal access for PCNL

Dorit E. Zilberman, Nir Kleinmann, Oliana Vazhgovsky, Shai Tejman‐Yarden, Rinat Lasmanovich, Zohar Dotan, Asaf Shvero, Orel Hemo, Maayan Dagan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Achieving renal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy is challenging, with a complication rate of 10-20%. This study aims to assess a novel technique for planning access to the renal collecting system using augmented reality (AR). Using Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine software (DICOM 2-print), we generated 3-dimensional (3D) models of patients with different types of kidney stones (staghorn, lower pole, and pelvic stones) who underwent PCNL between 2018 and 2022. After viewing the patient's CT scans, surgeons explored the anatomical models using an AR system with a stereoscopic 3D lens array display. Using questionnaires, we quantitatively estimated the model's contribution on a scale of "1" ("poor") to "5" ("excellent") to the surgeon's understanding of stone location, patient anatomy, and ease of access compared to 2D CT imaging. A total of 38 questionnaires were completed by 13 urologists. Estimating renal location, renal pelvis, and stone mass were better demonstrated by AR (5 vs. 4, p < 0.001). The orientation of adjacent organs was better understood using AR (5 vs. 4, p = 0.004). In 86.8% of cases, surgeons preferred using AR models both before and during surgery, with 69.2% suggesting that AR could enhance procedural safety. The time frames for testing the models differed between senior and junior practitioners (p = 0.016) and were significantly reduced with model experience (p < 0.001). When comparing CT to 3D imaging, AR models provide a better understating of stone location, patient anatomy, and route of access to the collecting system. Further research is required to implement this innovative technique preoperatively and intra-operatively.

UrolithiasisVol. 53(1)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Tel Aviv University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.