Predictive Modelling of Patient Outcomes Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Algorithmic Approaches in Healthcare

The study addresses the problem of prediction of patient outcomes in healthcare with machine learning methods, including such options like logistic regression, decision trees, random forests and support vector machines. Comparative modelling of these approaches also was done to assess their effectiveness in predicting outcomes like disease worsening, treatment response, and mortality rates among other clinical delineations. The study employed a data collection policy of diverse data set which encompassed the demographic information, clinical measures and treatment methods from an electronic health record system of tertiary care hospital. This reveals a fact that Randon Forests performed better than rest of the algorithms (0.88 for accuracy and 0.93 for AUC-ROC score). On the contrary, logistic regression and SVM also showed good results with an accuracy reaching 0.85 and 0.87 respectively. Decision trees acquire a small performance, and such accuracy is 0.78. It is the results of these studies that provide information about the abilities and the difficulties of different approaches in the historical analysis, guiding the healthcare workers and data scientists in the selection of appropriate methods for improving patient care and the process of medical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/globalaisummit62156.2024.10947831
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Modelling of Patient Outcomes Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Algorithmic Approaches in Healthcare

Rohit Dixit, Amol Dattatray Dhaygude, Harshitha Raghavan Devarajan, Sivasubramanian Balasubramanian et al.
6 citations
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
2.32
article

Predictive Modelling of Patient Outcomes Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Algorithmic Approaches in Healthcare

Rohit Dixit, Amol Dattatray Dhaygude, Harshitha Raghavan Devarajan, Sivasubramanian Balasubramanian, Harshvardhan Chunawala, Rajkumar Jhapte
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The study addresses the problem of prediction of patient outcomes in healthcare with machine learning methods, including such options like logistic regression, decision trees, random forests and support vector machines. Comparative modelling of these approaches also was done to assess their effectiveness in predicting outcomes like disease worsening, treatment response, and mortality rates among other clinical delineations. The study employed a data collection policy of diverse data set which encompassed the demographic information, clinical measures and treatment methods from an electronic health record system of tertiary care hospital. This reveals a fact that Randon Forests performed better than rest of the algorithms (0.88 for accuracy and 0.93 for AUC-ROC score). On the contrary, logistic regression and SVM also showed good results with an accuracy reaching 0.85 and 0.87 respectively. Decision trees acquire a small performance, and such accuracy is 0.78. It is the results of these studies that provide information about the abilities and the difficulties of different approaches in the historical analysis, guiding the healthcare workers and data scientists in the selection of appropriate methods for improving patient care and the process of medical decision-making.

Amazon (United States) (US), University of Washington (US), Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal (IN), Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States) (US), Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US), Seattle University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.