Brazilian Public Spending Cap and the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Brazilian Constitutional Amendment No. 95/16 established a spending caps regime for the Union's primary expenditures, innovating in relation to the fiscal targets regime of the Fiscal Responsibility Law. However, the alternatives for fiscal balance are the object of dispute between different approaches of economic and social policy advocacy groups. The purpose of this paper is to carry out an analysis of the value systems of coalitions that defend antagonistic positions in the fiscal policy subsystem and to map the main actors of these coalitions. As a result of applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework, it was identified that the Covid-19 pandemic is an event (external shock) of large proportions. Nonetheless, during the period analyzed, this external shock was not sufficient to affect the policy core beliefs of the existing coalitions. Comparatively, this is also the conclusion we reached when analyzing the behavior of fiscal consolidation measures in the European Union in the face of the Covid-19 crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developments in Administration
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46996/dina.v6i1.8527
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brazilian Public Spending Cap and the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jo�ão Ricardo Catarino, Leonardo Luiz Barretti Secchi, Gerson dos Santos Sicca
Developments in Administration
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Brazilian Public Spending Cap and the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jo�ão Ricardo Catarino, Leonardo Luiz Barretti Secchi, Gerson dos Santos Sicca
article en

Abstract

The Brazilian Constitutional Amendment No. 95/16 established a spending caps regime for the Union's primary expenditures, innovating in relation to the fiscal targets regime of the Fiscal Responsibility Law. However, the alternatives for fiscal balance are the object of dispute between different approaches of economic and social policy advocacy groups. The purpose of this paper is to carry out an analysis of the value systems of coalitions that defend antagonistic positions in the fiscal policy subsystem and to map the main actors of these coalitions. As a result of applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework, it was identified that the Covid-19 pandemic is an event (external shock) of large proportions. Nonetheless, during the period analyzed, this external shock was not sufficient to affect the policy core beliefs of the existing coalitions. Comparatively, this is also the conclusion we reached when analyzing the behavior of fiscal consolidation measures in the European Union in the face of the Covid-19 crisis.

Developments in AdministrationVol. 6(1)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR), Supreme Court of the United States (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.