Development and validation of a simple-to-use coronary calcium score based nomograph for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease

Screening for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial. Conventional cardiovascular risk models have relatively poor performance in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease. CAC score (CACS) is the strongest predictor of obstructive CAD. This study developed and validated the performance of obstructive CAD prediction model (PREDICT-OCAD) and further studied that PREDICT-OCAD can save unnecessary expense by correctly reclassifying patients as low likelihood for obstructive CAD without further testing. To develop and validate the performance of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) based nomogram for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). 4994 participants undergoing CACS and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) from four medical centers were retrospectively included for model development (n = 2649), internal (n = 1135) and external validation (n = 1210). Coronary artery stenosis on CCTA and CACS were measured. Regression models were developed and compared. A nomogram was generated to identify potential predictors associated with obstructive CAD. In development sets, CACS had incremental value for prediction of obstructive CAD compared to cardiovascular risk factors-based model, with higher area under the curves (AUCs) (0.848 [95%CI: 0.830–0.866] vs. 0.879 [95%CI: 0.857-0.900]; P = 0.029), net reclassification improvement (NRI) index (0.577 [95%CI: 0.482–0.672]; P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index (0.186 [95%CI: 0.159–0.213]; P < 0.001). A nomogram (PREDICT-OCAD) provided significantly incremental discriminate value to CACS (AUC: 0.893 [95%CI: 0.869–0.917]; P = 0.027), which was confirmed by continuous NRI (0.392 [95%CI: 0.247–0.538]; P < 0.001), categorical NRI (0.069 [95%CI: 0.001–0.137]; P = 0.045) and IDI (0.039 [95%CI: 0.02–0.0580]; P < 0.001), resulted in the revision of management plan as determined by cardiovascular risk factors in 18.6% (492/2649) of patients, of whom 77.2% (380/492) were correctly reclassified. Our developed simple-to-use CACS based nomogram model (PREDICT-OCAD) performs better than conventional clinical model or CACS alone, which is a useful tool for risk stratification of CAD in primary health system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42058-025-00189-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a simple-to-use coronary calcium score based nomograph for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease

Changsheng Zhou, Jiani Zou, Long Jiang Zhang, Junhao Li et al.
1 citations
Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
1.36
article

Development and validation of a simple-to-use coronary calcium score based nomograph for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease

Changsheng Zhou, Jiani Zou, Long Jiang Zhang, Junhao Li, Tongyuan Liu, Bin Hu, Xiangwei Luo, Wei Xu, Jingjing Pan, Liang Li, Yu Zhang, Ya Liu, Zijian Chen, Fan Zhou, Rui Zuo, Chun Xiang Tang, Lin‐Feng Zhai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Screening for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial. Conventional cardiovascular risk models have relatively poor performance in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease. CAC score (CACS) is the strongest predictor of obstructive CAD. This study developed and validated the performance of obstructive CAD prediction model (PREDICT-OCAD) and further studied that PREDICT-OCAD can save unnecessary expense by correctly reclassifying patients as low likelihood for obstructive CAD without further testing. To develop and validate the performance of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) based nomogram for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). 4994 participants undergoing CACS and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) from four medical centers were retrospectively included for model development (n = 2649), internal (n = 1135) and external validation (n = 1210). Coronary artery stenosis on CCTA and CACS were measured. Regression models were developed and compared. A nomogram was generated to identify potential predictors associated with obstructive CAD. In development sets, CACS had incremental value for prediction of obstructive CAD compared to cardiovascular risk factors-based model, with higher area under the curves (AUCs) (0.848 [95%CI: 0.830–0.866] vs. 0.879 [95%CI: 0.857-0.900]; P = 0.029), net reclassification improvement (NRI) index (0.577 [95%CI: 0.482–0.672]; P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index (0.186 [95%CI: 0.159–0.213]; P < 0.001). A nomogram (PREDICT-OCAD) provided significantly incremental discriminate value to CACS (AUC: 0.893 [95%CI: 0.869–0.917]; P = 0.027), which was confirmed by continuous NRI (0.392 [95%CI: 0.247–0.538]; P < 0.001), categorical NRI (0.069 [95%CI: 0.001–0.137]; P = 0.045) and IDI (0.039 [95%CI: 0.02–0.0580]; P < 0.001), resulted in the revision of management plan as determined by cardiovascular risk factors in 18.6% (492/2649) of patients, of whom 77.2% (380/492) were correctly reclassified. Our developed simple-to-use CACS based nomogram model (PREDICT-OCAD) performs better than conventional clinical model or CACS alone, which is a useful tool for risk stratification of CAD in primary health system.

Chinese Journal of Academic RadiologyVol. 8(2)
Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN), 81th Hospital of PLA (CN), Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an (CN), Central Hospital of Wuhan (CN), Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou (CN), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.