Chicken or egg? Attribution hypothesis and nocebo hypothesis to explain somatization associated to perceived RF-EMF exposure
This finding stands out from most of the existing literature, which primarily points to the nocebo effect as the main explanation for somatization in response to RF-EMF exposure. While this does not exclude, in absolute terms, the existence of a nocebo effect, potentially at other time scales, this finding has relevant consequences at the policy making level. The emerging relevance of the attribution hypothesis moves the focus on the discomfort of people with unexplained symptoms and their need to find a plausible explanation for their discomfort.
Authors
- Silvia Ariccio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8328-0014)
- L. Portengen
- Astrid L. Martens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2055-5527)
- Pauline Slottje (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8576-0011)
- Anke Huss (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9268-1867)
- R. Vermeulen
- Eugenio Traini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9965-1203)
Institutions
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Public Health
- Published
- 2025-04-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1561373
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.90
Funders
- European Commission
- ZonMw
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme