Donor-Recipient Mismatch in Lung Transplantation: The Role of Graft Sizing in Clinical Outcomes

Lung transplantation is a life-saving procedure for end-stage lung diseases. Size matching is critical in the donor-recipient selection process. This retrospective study analyzed 146 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2013 and 2023. Patients who required graft resizing were assigned to the sizing group (S), non-resizing cases to the non-sizing group (NS). The primary goal was to identify predictive factors for graft resizing. Secondary endpoints included ischemia time, ventilation time, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and hospital stay. The S group was further stratified on baseline parameters to assess differences in outcomes. Recipient height and single transplants were higher in the NS group. Donor-recipient height ratio was the only predictor for resizing (p = 0.02). Postoperative outcomes and overall survival were similar between the groups. In Group S, male patients showed higher rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic rejection, the former being associated also with anatomical resections; patients older than 50 experienced higher rates of PGD. Graft resizing is a feasible strategy for addressing size mismatch, but it is associated with increased risks of PGD and AKI, particularly in older male recipients and those undergoing anatomical resections. These findings highlight the importance of careful preoperative donor-recipient size matching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplant International
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2025.14387
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Donor-Recipient Mismatch in Lung Transplantation: The Role of Graft Sizing in Clinical Outcomes

Miriana d’Alessandro, Piero Paladini, Luca Luzzi, David Bennett et al.
3 citations
Transplant International
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
6.02
article

Donor-Recipient Mismatch in Lung Transplantation: The Role of Graft Sizing in Clinical Outcomes

Miriana d’Alessandro, Piero Paladini, Luca Luzzi, David Bennett, Chiara Catelli, Elena Bargagli, Federico Franchi, Andrea Lloret Madrid, Antonella Fossi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Lung transplantation is a life-saving procedure for end-stage lung diseases. Size matching is critical in the donor-recipient selection process. This retrospective study analyzed 146 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2013 and 2023. Patients who required graft resizing were assigned to the sizing group (S), non-resizing cases to the non-sizing group (NS). The primary goal was to identify predictive factors for graft resizing. Secondary endpoints included ischemia time, ventilation time, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and hospital stay. The S group was further stratified on baseline parameters to assess differences in outcomes. Recipient height and single transplants were higher in the NS group. Donor-recipient height ratio was the only predictor for resizing (p = 0.02). Postoperative outcomes and overall survival were similar between the groups. In Group S, male patients showed higher rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic rejection, the former being associated also with anatomical resections; patients older than 50 experienced higher rates of PGD. Graft resizing is a feasible strategy for addressing size mismatch, but it is associated with increased risks of PGD and AKI, particularly in older male recipients and those undergoing anatomical resections. These findings highlight the importance of careful preoperative donor-recipient size matching.

Transplant InternationalVol. 38
University of Siena (IT), Neuroscience Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.