Towards an understanding of strategy-as-systemic practice (SASP): a system-theoretic view of strategy-as-practice

Purpose Over the past two decades, strategy-as-practice (SAP) has emerged as a pivotal area in contemporary strategy research. However, its evolution has led to diverse research streams and interpretations, creating complexity and fragmentation within the literature. To address this issue, this paper aims to propose a holistic framework that applies systems thinking to provide a more coherent and comprehensive understanding of SAP. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews, synthesises and integrates key literature in SAP and systems theory to develop a conceptual theoretical framework. Findings The framework systematically conceptualises the structural dynamics of SAP through key components: input, process, output, feedback loop and external environment. In addition, the authors derive theoretical propositions using logical reasoning based on the system-theoretic approach. Originality/value This study contributes to SAP research by offering a systems-theoretic perspective that enhances theoretical development in the field. This paper concludes with a discussion of the framework’s implications, along with directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of organizational analysis
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-01-2025-5133
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an understanding of strategy-as-systemic practice (SASP): a system-theoretic view of strategy-as-practice

Debadutta Kumar Panda, Rohit Bhardwaj
1 links
International journal of organizational analysis
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Towards an understanding of strategy-as-systemic practice (SASP): a system-theoretic view of strategy-as-practice

Debadutta Kumar Panda, Rohit Bhardwaj
article en

Abstract

Purpose Over the past two decades, strategy-as-practice (SAP) has emerged as a pivotal area in contemporary strategy research. However, its evolution has led to diverse research streams and interpretations, creating complexity and fragmentation within the literature. To address this issue, this paper aims to propose a holistic framework that applies systems thinking to provide a more coherent and comprehensive understanding of SAP. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews, synthesises and integrates key literature in SAP and systems theory to develop a conceptual theoretical framework. Findings The framework systematically conceptualises the structural dynamics of SAP through key components: input, process, output, feedback loop and external environment. In addition, the authors derive theoretical propositions using logical reasoning based on the system-theoretic approach. Originality/value This study contributes to SAP research by offering a systems-theoretic perspective that enhances theoretical development in the field. This paper concludes with a discussion of the framework’s implications, along with directions for future research.

International journal of organizational analysisVol. 34(2)
XIM University (IN), Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards an understanding of strategy-as-systemic practice (SASP): a system-theoretic view of strategy-as-practice — Debadutta Kumar Panda, Rohit Bhardwaj · International journal of organizational analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS