Bringing Operational Perspectives into the Analysis of Engineered Resilient Systems

ABSTRACT Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS) is a Department of Defense (DoD) program focusing on the effective and efficient design and development of complex engineered systems across their lifecycle. An important area of focus is the evaluation of early‐stage design alternatives in terms of their modeled operational performance and characteristics. The work in this paper ties together differentiated operational needs with requirements specification and maturation of previous analytical constructs toward a more operationally relevant viewpoint. We expand on the concept of Broad Utility as a high‐level aggregated measure of robustness of fielded system capabilities with respect to operational requirements. The relation to requirements is more explicit, and systems are failing to achieve threshold requirements are penalized. The impact of this approach and how it offers a foundation from which to more fully explore sensitivity to Pre‐Milestone A requirements are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Insight
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12524
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bringing Operational Perspectives into the Analysis of Engineered Resilient Systems

Tommer R. Ender, Simon R. Goerger, Santiago Balestrini‐Robinson, Valerie B. Sitterle et al.
Insight
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Bringing Operational Perspectives into the Analysis of Engineered Resilient Systems

Tommer R. Ender, Simon R. Goerger, Santiago Balestrini‐Robinson, Valerie B. Sitterle, Dane F. Freeman, Erika L. Brimhall
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS) is a Department of Defense (DoD) program focusing on the effective and efficient design and development of complex engineered systems across their lifecycle. An important area of focus is the evaluation of early‐stage design alternatives in terms of their modeled operational performance and characteristics. The work in this paper ties together differentiated operational needs with requirements specification and maturation of previous analytical constructs toward a more operationally relevant viewpoint. We expand on the concept of Broad Utility as a high‐level aggregated measure of robustness of fielded system capabilities with respect to operational requirements. The relation to requirements is more explicit, and systems are failing to achieve threshold requirements are penalized. The impact of this approach and how it offers a foundation from which to more fully explore sensitivity to Pre‐Milestone A requirements are discussed.

InsightVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.