The role of public participation and legal certainty in lawmaking in a special legal order – with particular reference to Central European practice

This study deals with the issue of public participation and legal certainty in the context of legislation in special legal order. The hypothesis of the research is that in times of crises, we cannot fully disengage from the rule of law, as the special legal order does not result in a situation of extra-legalism, as its purpose is to restore normality. The aim of this thesis is to examine how the principles of quality legislation (e.g., the right to be consulted by society, the prior assessment of the impact of legislation, or the requirement for preparation time before the legislation is put into force) that can be defined in the normal legal order apply in special legal order situations. In examining this question, the study draws on literature and case law. After clarifying the basic doctrinal concepts, the study examines the qualitative legislative requirements in the normal legal system, and then takes these as a starting point to examine the differences in special legal order. The conclusion of the study is that public participation in legislation can be restricted in special legal situations (e.g., the right to consult on legislation or the right of assembly for the collective expression of opinions), while legal security requirements such as the requirement for the adequate preparation time or the linking of special legal norms to empowerment cannot be ignored. With regard to the latter, it is particularly important that the legislator does not deviate from the purpose justifying the introduction of the special legal order, as failure to do so will cause legitimacy problems both with regard to the legislation issued and the sustainability and social support for the special legal order introduced. Only by adhering to these principles can special legal order legislation remain a process within the constitutional legal order and not outside it, and only in this way can it effectively serve the quick and efficient return to normal legal order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1568066
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of public participation and legal certainty in lawmaking in a special legal order – with particular reference to Central European practice

Gábor Kurunczi
1 links
Frontiers in Political Science
Law in Society and Culture
article

The role of public participation and legal certainty in lawmaking in a special legal order – with particular reference to Central European practice

Gábor Kurunczi
article en

Abstract

This study deals with the issue of public participation and legal certainty in the context of legislation in special legal order. The hypothesis of the research is that in times of crises, we cannot fully disengage from the rule of law, as the special legal order does not result in a situation of extra-legalism, as its purpose is to restore normality. The aim of this thesis is to examine how the principles of quality legislation (e.g., the right to be consulted by society, the prior assessment of the impact of legislation, or the requirement for preparation time before the legislation is put into force) that can be defined in the normal legal order apply in special legal order situations. In examining this question, the study draws on literature and case law. After clarifying the basic doctrinal concepts, the study examines the qualitative legislative requirements in the normal legal system, and then takes these as a starting point to examine the differences in special legal order. The conclusion of the study is that public participation in legislation can be restricted in special legal situations (e.g., the right to consult on legislation or the right of assembly for the collective expression of opinions), while legal security requirements such as the requirement for the adequate preparation time or the linking of special legal norms to empowerment cannot be ignored. With regard to the latter, it is particularly important that the legislator does not deviate from the purpose justifying the introduction of the special legal order, as failure to do so will cause legitimacy problems both with regard to the legislation issued and the sustainability and social support for the special legal order introduced. Only by adhering to these principles can special legal order legislation remain a process within the constitutional legal order and not outside it, and only in this way can it effectively serve the quick and efficient return to normal legal order.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
Pázmány Péter Catholic University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The role of public participation and legal certainty in lawmaking in a special legal order – with particular reference to Central European practice — Gábor Kurunczi · Frontiers in Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS