Changes in perceived age discrimination over time: Patterns, predictors, and outcomes

Abstract Age discrimination at work represents a major challenge with detrimental impacts on employees and organizations. Although age discrimination theories suggest that workers experience increasing levels of age discrimination over time, prior evidence suggests that there may be substantial heterogeneity in the way perceived age discrimination changes over time. Conceptualizing age discrimination at work as a stressor, and integrating the model of exposure and reactivity to stressors with allostatic load theory, we examine changes in perceived age discrimination, along with its predictors and outcomes. We use a person‐ and target‐centered approach with a nationally representative archival dataset from Switzerland ( N = 1110) relying on a prospective design over seven years. Randomly splitting the sample into two (Half‐samples A and B), we find three change patterns (i.e., increasing, decreasing, and stable nonexistent) of perceived age discrimination at work in Half‐sample A. In Half‐sample B, we replicated these three patterns and found that the heterogeneity in change patterns was predicted by employees' age and belief in a just world, but not neuroticism. We also observed that these change patterns were associated with job satisfaction, work strain, and perceived employability. We further discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psychology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70011
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in perceived age discrimination over time: Patterns, predictors, and outcomes

Mo Wang, Yiduo Shao, Franciska Krings, Ariane Froidevaux et al.
3 citations
Applied Psychology
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
16.78
article

Changes in perceived age discrimination over time: Patterns, predictors, and outcomes

Mo Wang, Yiduo Shao, Franciska Krings, Ariane Froidevaux, Ieva Urbanavičiūtė, Serge P. da Motta Veiga
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Age discrimination at work represents a major challenge with detrimental impacts on employees and organizations. Although age discrimination theories suggest that workers experience increasing levels of age discrimination over time, prior evidence suggests that there may be substantial heterogeneity in the way perceived age discrimination changes over time. Conceptualizing age discrimination at work as a stressor, and integrating the model of exposure and reactivity to stressors with allostatic load theory, we examine changes in perceived age discrimination, along with its predictors and outcomes. We use a person‐ and target‐centered approach with a nationally representative archival dataset from Switzerland ( N = 1110) relying on a prospective design over seven years. Randomly splitting the sample into two (Half‐samples A and B), we find three change patterns (i.e., increasing, decreasing, and stable nonexistent) of perceived age discrimination at work in Half‐sample A. In Half‐sample B, we replicated these three patterns and found that the heterogeneity in change patterns was predicted by employees' age and belief in a just world, but not neuroticism. We also observed that these change patterns were associated with job satisfaction, work strain, and perceived employability. We further discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Applied PsychologyVol. 74(2)
University of Iowa (US), NEOMA Business School (FR), Vilnius University (LT), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), University of Florida (US), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
16.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.