Bioenergy Production From Sugarcane Straw: Implications for Soil‐Related Ecosystem Services

ABSTRACT Sugarcane straw removal for bioenergy production—especially second‐generation ethanol—is shown to be a promising pathway for decarbonization. However, indiscriminate straw removal can negatively affect soil‐related ecosystem services (SES), compromising the sustainability of the associated bioenergy production. Here, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to select and quantify the changes in agronomic and environmental indicators affected by low (≤ 1/3), moderate (> 1/3 to ≤ 2/3), and high (> 2/3) straw removal levels and the consequential impacts on eight SES. A quali‐quantitative approach was developed to generate an impact matrix that provides the direction of the effects (negative, neutral, or positive) and the associated confidence levels. Overall, the lowest impact on SES occurs under low straw removal with a neutral effect on C storage, nutrient cycling, weed control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and provision of food and bioenergy. Water regulation, erosion control, and maintenance of soil biodiversity were the SES most negatively affected by straw removal. Moderate and high levels of straw removal negatively impact the maintenance of SES and compromise the sustainability of sugarcane cultivation areas, except for pest control and soil GHG emission mitigation. Finally, it was also discussed how the negative impacts of straw removal on SES could be mitigated or even reversed through the adoption of best management practices, such as cover crops, organic amendments, biological products (e.g., use of phosphate‐solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi), reduced tillage, and machinery traffic control. Ultimately, the results of this study can be useful to guide decision‐making by farmers, investors, stakeholders, and policymakers toward sustainable bioenergy production that contributes to a low‐carbon economy and climate change mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioenergy Production From Sugarcane Straw: Implications for Soil‐Related Ecosystem Services

Ricardo de Oliveira Bordonal, Maurício Roberto Cherubin, Lucas Pecci Canisares, João Luís Nunes Carvalho et al.
1 citations
GCB Bioenergy
Bioenergy crop production and management
1.90
article

Bioenergy Production From Sugarcane Straw: Implications for Soil‐Related Ecosystem Services

Ricardo de Oliveira Bordonal, Maurício Roberto Cherubin, Lucas Pecci Canisares, João Luís Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Roberto Pinheiro, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sugarcane straw removal for bioenergy production—especially second‐generation ethanol—is shown to be a promising pathway for decarbonization. However, indiscriminate straw removal can negatively affect soil‐related ecosystem services (SES), compromising the sustainability of the associated bioenergy production. Here, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to select and quantify the changes in agronomic and environmental indicators affected by low (≤ 1/3), moderate (> 1/3 to ≤ 2/3), and high (> 2/3) straw removal levels and the consequential impacts on eight SES. A quali‐quantitative approach was developed to generate an impact matrix that provides the direction of the effects (negative, neutral, or positive) and the associated confidence levels. Overall, the lowest impact on SES occurs under low straw removal with a neutral effect on C storage, nutrient cycling, weed control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and provision of food and bioenergy. Water regulation, erosion control, and maintenance of soil biodiversity were the SES most negatively affected by straw removal. Moderate and high levels of straw removal negatively impact the maintenance of SES and compromise the sustainability of sugarcane cultivation areas, except for pest control and soil GHG emission mitigation. Finally, it was also discussed how the negative impacts of straw removal on SES could be mitigated or even reversed through the adoption of best management practices, such as cover crops, organic amendments, biological products (e.g., use of phosphate‐solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi), reduced tillage, and machinery traffic control. Ultimately, the results of this study can be useful to guide decision‐making by farmers, investors, stakeholders, and policymakers toward sustainable bioenergy production that contributes to a low‐carbon economy and climate change mitigation.

GCB BioenergyVol. 17(5)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Forest Science and Research Institute (BR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Bioenergy crop production and management
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.