Re-Imagin(in)g Territorial Conflict

Territorial disputes continue to fuel both armed conflicts and security threats around the world despite norms against the violent resolution of territorial conflict. The pervasiveness of territorial conflict presents a puzzle since the value of territory has allegedly decreased in an age of globalization and interdependence, and many territorial conflicts involve territory with little tangible value. Our inquiry begins not with states, but with groups and rules of group membership. Changing the unit of analysis to the group and its membership rules exposes the bases for territorial disputes both historically and in current world politics. We show that under different rules of group membership, territory has different meanings. Different rules directly affect which territory will be contested. Conflict is particularly likely and especially difficult to resolve when groups with different rules of membership lay claim to the same territory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-024152
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-Imagin(in)g Territorial Conflict

H. E. Goemans, David B. Carter
1 citations
Annual Review of Political Science
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
16.49
article

Re-Imagin(in)g Territorial Conflict

H. E. Goemans, David B. Carter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Territorial disputes continue to fuel both armed conflicts and security threats around the world despite norms against the violent resolution of territorial conflict. The pervasiveness of territorial conflict presents a puzzle since the value of territory has allegedly decreased in an age of globalization and interdependence, and many territorial conflicts involve territory with little tangible value. Our inquiry begins not with states, but with groups and rules of group membership. Changing the unit of analysis to the group and its membership rules exposes the bases for territorial disputes both historically and in current world politics. We show that under different rules of group membership, territory has different meanings. Different rules directly affect which territory will be contested. Conflict is particularly likely and especially difficult to resolve when groups with different rules of membership lay claim to the same territory.

Annual Review of Political ScienceVol. 28(1)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
16.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.