A Survey on Quality Evaluation of Instruction Fine-tuning Datasets for Large Language Models

Instruction fine-tuning is a key method for adapting large language models (LLMs) to domain-specific tasks, and instruction quality significantly impacts model performance after fine-tuning. Hence, evaluating the quality of instruction and selecting high-quality instructions are essential steps in the process of LLM instruction fine-tuning. Although existing studies provide important theoretical foundations and techniques for this, there is still room for improvement in terms of generality, the relationship between methods and experimental verification. Current methods for evaluating instruction quality can be classified into four main categories: human evaluation, statistics-based evaluation, model-based evaluation, and LLMs-based evaluation. Among these methods, human evaluation relies on the subjective judgment and domain expertise of the evaluators, which offers interpretability and is suitable for scenarios involving small-scale data and sufficient budgets. Statistics-based evaluation estimates the quality of instructions using indicators such as stopwords and lexical diversity, providing high efficiency and a suitable evaluation for large-scale data. Model-based evaluation employs specific models to quantify indicators such as perplexity (PPL) and instruction following difficulty (IFD), which is flexible and suitable for specific tasks. The LLMs-based evaluation rates the quality of instructions through prompt-based interaction with LLMs, focusing on aspects such as accuracy and coherence, which is highly automated and customizable, simplifying the evaluation process. Finally, considering the limitations of current quality evaluation methods, some future research directions are proposed for improvement. These include refining instruction categories, extending evaluation indicators, enhancing human-AI interaction evaluation method, applying agents in instruction quality evaluation, and developing a comprehensive evaluation framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Data Intelligence
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/2096-7004.di.2025.0021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey on Quality Evaluation of Instruction Fine-tuning Datasets for Large Language Models

Feng Gao, Siyi Gu, Yi Luo, Lu Zhang et al.
2 citations
Data Intelligence
Natural Language Processing Techniques
4.96
article

A Survey on Quality Evaluation of Instruction Fine-tuning Datasets for Large Language Models

Feng Gao, Siyi Gu, Yi Luo, Lu Zhang, Jie Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Instruction fine-tuning is a key method for adapting large language models (LLMs) to domain-specific tasks, and instruction quality significantly impacts model performance after fine-tuning. Hence, evaluating the quality of instruction and selecting high-quality instructions are essential steps in the process of LLM instruction fine-tuning. Although existing studies provide important theoretical foundations and techniques for this, there is still room for improvement in terms of generality, the relationship between methods and experimental verification. Current methods for evaluating instruction quality can be classified into four main categories: human evaluation, statistics-based evaluation, model-based evaluation, and LLMs-based evaluation. Among these methods, human evaluation relies on the subjective judgment and domain expertise of the evaluators, which offers interpretability and is suitable for scenarios involving small-scale data and sufficient budgets. Statistics-based evaluation estimates the quality of instructions using indicators such as stopwords and lexical diversity, providing high efficiency and a suitable evaluation for large-scale data. Model-based evaluation employs specific models to quantify indicators such as perplexity (PPL) and instruction following difficulty (IFD), which is flexible and suitable for specific tasks. The LLMs-based evaluation rates the quality of instructions through prompt-based interaction with LLMs, focusing on aspects such as accuracy and coherence, which is highly automated and customizable, simplifying the evaluation process. Finally, considering the limitations of current quality evaluation methods, some future research directions are proposed for improvement. These include refining instruction categories, extending evaluation indicators, enhancing human-AI interaction evaluation method, applying agents in instruction quality evaluation, and developing a comprehensive evaluation framework.

Data IntelligenceVol. 7(3)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.