Implementing a novel signage-only School Streets approach: Facilitators, barriers, and perceived outcomes

School Streets is a time-specific traffic restriction scheme aimed to reduce traffic around schools during pick up and drop off times. This is believed to benefit school children by reducing surrounding air pollution, improving child safety, and encouraging active travel. Newcastle City Council implemented a novel signage-only School Streets at four primary schools in Newcastle. Interviews (n = 46) and focus groups (n = 7 groups with a total of 48 participants) were conducted with stakeholders, school leaders, parents, pupils, and residents to understand the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of School Streets and the perceived effectiveness of this scheme. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Most facilitator themes related to the simplicity of the signage-only design and the existing work structures. The barriers centred around infrequent communication within the inner setting (local authority, delivery partner and school leadership) and sustaining the level of engagement. The recipients of the scheme were in favour of the messaging behind School Streets but did not perceive changes in traffic or travel behaviour in the area, potentially related to the lack of enforcement. Minimal changes to travel behaviour may be due to external factors such as distance lived from school or physical infrastructure. While the signage-only approach to School Streets reduced the implementation cost and infrastructure changes required, it required a high level of engagement and communication. Recipients desired more enforcement to increase and maintain compliance of the scheme long-term. • Signage-only approach reduces implementation cost but increases engagement needs. • Frequent communication with stakeholders is needed for successful implementation. • Perceived changes to traffic outside the schools were minimal. • Parents, pupils, and residents wanted enforcement to increase compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing a novel signage-only School Streets approach: Facilitators, barriers, and perceived outcomes

Lauren B. Sherar, Mark Gussy, Yvanna Todorova, Verónica Varela-Mato et al.
1 citations
Journal of Transport & Health
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
article

Implementing a novel signage-only School Streets approach: Facilitators, barriers, and perceived outcomes

Lauren B. Sherar, Mark Gussy, Yvanna Todorova, Verónica Varela-Mato, Liliana Ángel Vargas, Denise Kendrick, Elizabeth Orton, Jo Barnes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

School Streets is a time-specific traffic restriction scheme aimed to reduce traffic around schools during pick up and drop off times. This is believed to benefit school children by reducing surrounding air pollution, improving child safety, and encouraging active travel. Newcastle City Council implemented a novel signage-only School Streets at four primary schools in Newcastle. Interviews (n = 46) and focus groups (n = 7 groups with a total of 48 participants) were conducted with stakeholders, school leaders, parents, pupils, and residents to understand the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of School Streets and the perceived effectiveness of this scheme. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Most facilitator themes related to the simplicity of the signage-only design and the existing work structures. The barriers centred around infrequent communication within the inner setting (local authority, delivery partner and school leadership) and sustaining the level of engagement. The recipients of the scheme were in favour of the messaging behind School Streets but did not perceive changes in traffic or travel behaviour in the area, potentially related to the lack of enforcement. Minimal changes to travel behaviour may be due to external factors such as distance lived from school or physical infrastructure. While the signage-only approach to School Streets reduced the implementation cost and infrastructure changes required, it required a high level of engagement and communication. Recipients desired more enforcement to increase and maintain compliance of the scheme long-term. • Signage-only approach reduces implementation cost but increases engagement needs. • Frequent communication with stakeholders is needed for successful implementation. • Perceived changes to traffic outside the schools were minimal. • Parents, pupils, and residents wanted enforcement to increase compliance.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 42
University of Nottingham (GB), Loughborough University (GB), University of Lincoln (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.