Leadership Mentoring Programme for Women: Framing Leader Identity through Dialoguing and Relating

This paper restores the focus on the essence of human beings as fundamentally relational. It underlines a concern for genuine relatedness (Pope and Nicolaides, 2021) between mentee and mentor, as foundational to leader identity formation for women in a leadership mentoring programme. Expressions of the centrality of connection, the relational self, have been extended by feminist scholars, in particular, across the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Fletcher (2001) pointed to the “disappearing” of the very behaviour needed to be successful in the workplace. The capacity of human beings to connect and care, Gilligan (2014) argues, is lessened when living the values of patriarchy (Fishbane, 2023). Positioned at the intersection of mentoring at work (Kram, 1983, 1985/1988) and relational science (Berscheid, 1999), this multiperspectival qualitative study explored the research question: How do women mentees experience leadership mentoring in an Irish Higher Education context? Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, (IPA) underpinned by three major areas of the philosophy of knowledge, namely, phenomenology, hermeneutics and idiography, offered a pathway to illuminating the intersubjectivity between mentees and mentor within their dyads. The mentoring dyads comprised of women mentees who participated in a leadership mentoring programme and their matched mentors. Semi-structured interviews followed by three levels of analysis were conducted with mentees, mentors and the dyads. Energised by close attention to participant accounts, consistent with the principles of IPA, exploring the experience of participants in their own terms, required setting aside pre-existing assumptions and ideas (Smith, Flowers and Larkin, 2022). Conducting multiple iterations of analysis and interpretation, the findings underscored the importance of a focus on both the quality of the Developmental Relational Mentoring Space (DRMS) (Ganly, 2024) and the relational orientation within each dyad, for meaningful and effective mentoring experiences. This study developed the innovative DRMS construct to describe the relational dynamics in mentoring dyads, thus significantly enhancing insights into mentoring relationships. The DRMS is the mentoring space between mentee and mentor, co-created through dialogue influenced by both. A novel conceptual model, a feminist perspective, is presented emphasising the importance of intentionally attending to dialogue as a catalyst for reframing leader identity in mentoring dyads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Conference on Gender Research
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/icgr.8.1.3355
Primary Topic
Coaching Methods and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership Mentoring Programme for Women: Framing Leader Identity through Dialoguing and Relating

Ashley O’Donoghue, Serge Basini, Patricia Ganly
International Conference on Gender Research
Coaching Methods and Impact
article

Leadership Mentoring Programme for Women: Framing Leader Identity through Dialoguing and Relating

Ashley O’Donoghue, Serge Basini, Patricia Ganly
article en

Abstract

This paper restores the focus on the essence of human beings as fundamentally relational. It underlines a concern for genuine relatedness (Pope and Nicolaides, 2021) between mentee and mentor, as foundational to leader identity formation for women in a leadership mentoring programme. Expressions of the centrality of connection, the relational self, have been extended by feminist scholars, in particular, across the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Fletcher (2001) pointed to the “disappearing” of the very behaviour needed to be successful in the workplace. The capacity of human beings to connect and care, Gilligan (2014) argues, is lessened when living the values of patriarchy (Fishbane, 2023). Positioned at the intersection of mentoring at work (Kram, 1983, 1985/1988) and relational science (Berscheid, 1999), this multiperspectival qualitative study explored the research question: How do women mentees experience leadership mentoring in an Irish Higher Education context? Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, (IPA) underpinned by three major areas of the philosophy of knowledge, namely, phenomenology, hermeneutics and idiography, offered a pathway to illuminating the intersubjectivity between mentees and mentor within their dyads. The mentoring dyads comprised of women mentees who participated in a leadership mentoring programme and their matched mentors. Semi-structured interviews followed by three levels of analysis were conducted with mentees, mentors and the dyads. Energised by close attention to participant accounts, consistent with the principles of IPA, exploring the experience of participants in their own terms, required setting aside pre-existing assumptions and ideas (Smith, Flowers and Larkin, 2022). Conducting multiple iterations of analysis and interpretation, the findings underscored the importance of a focus on both the quality of the Developmental Relational Mentoring Space (DRMS) (Ganly, 2024) and the relational orientation within each dyad, for meaningful and effective mentoring experiences. This study developed the innovative DRMS construct to describe the relational dynamics in mentoring dyads, thus significantly enhancing insights into mentoring relationships. The DRMS is the mentoring space between mentee and mentor, co-created through dialogue influenced by both. A novel conceptual model, a feminist perspective, is presented emphasising the importance of intentionally attending to dialogue as a catalyst for reframing leader identity in mentoring dyads.

International Conference on Gender ResearchVol. 8(1)
Technological University Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Coaching Methods and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.