Marriage Guardians in Indonesian and Algerian Legislation: A Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Maslahat and Gender Justice

Purpose – The existence of guardians as a pillar of marriage has been regulated in family law in Muslim countries, two of which are Indonesia and Algeria. These two countries base each other on maslahat in formulating regulations regarding marriage guardians, but with different sociological realities and mazhab tendencies. This is due to the absence of qathi' nash that can be used as a basis for its determination. This study aims to comparatively analyze the provisions of marriage guardians in family law in Indonesia and Algeria in the concept of maslahat theory. Methods – This research uses normative juridical research methods with a statutory approach (statue approach) and comparison (comparative approach). Data sources come from secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials in the form of Law No.1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Family Code 1984 (Qanun Al Usrah). Meanwhile, secondary legal materials are obtained from books and scientific articles. Findings – The results of this study indicate that the principle of the problematical provisions of marriage guardians is aimed at maintaining and safeguarding the rights of women under their guardianship. The Indonesian Marriage Law and KHI stipulate that the marriage guardian is a pillar in the marriage contract, and explains in detail the provisions relating to guardianship in marriage in line with the opinion of the majority of scholars on this matter. Meanwhile, in the Qanun Al Usrah Family Code 1984, the marriage guardian is also a pillar of the marriage contract, but it does not elaborate in detail on matters relating to guardianship in marriage. The Family Code 1984 also gives adult women the freedom to choose their guardian to be present in the marriage contract. This seems to make guardianship not one of the pillars of marriage in accordance with the Hanafiyah opinion. It appears that Algeria attempted to adopt all of the scholarly opinions in the Family Code 1984. Research implications/limitations – Looking at the modern realities in the two Muslim countries, it is appropriate to make reforms to guardianship regulations that prioritize gender equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legitima Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33367/legitima.v6i2.4802
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marriage Guardians in Indonesian and Algerian Legislation: A Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Maslahat and Gender Justice

Ghifari Hirza Firhan Ali
Legitima Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Gender and Women's Rights
article

Marriage Guardians in Indonesian and Algerian Legislation: A Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Maslahat and Gender Justice

Ghifari Hirza Firhan Ali
article en

Abstract

Purpose – The existence of guardians as a pillar of marriage has been regulated in family law in Muslim countries, two of which are Indonesia and Algeria. These two countries base each other on maslahat in formulating regulations regarding marriage guardians, but with different sociological realities and mazhab tendencies. This is due to the absence of qathi' nash that can be used as a basis for its determination. This study aims to comparatively analyze the provisions of marriage guardians in family law in Indonesia and Algeria in the concept of maslahat theory. Methods – This research uses normative juridical research methods with a statutory approach (statue approach) and comparison (comparative approach). Data sources come from secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials in the form of Law No.1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Family Code 1984 (Qanun Al Usrah). Meanwhile, secondary legal materials are obtained from books and scientific articles. Findings – The results of this study indicate that the principle of the problematical provisions of marriage guardians is aimed at maintaining and safeguarding the rights of women under their guardianship. The Indonesian Marriage Law and KHI stipulate that the marriage guardian is a pillar in the marriage contract, and explains in detail the provisions relating to guardianship in marriage in line with the opinion of the majority of scholars on this matter. Meanwhile, in the Qanun Al Usrah Family Code 1984, the marriage guardian is also a pillar of the marriage contract, but it does not elaborate in detail on matters relating to guardianship in marriage. The Family Code 1984 also gives adult women the freedom to choose their guardian to be present in the marriage contract. This seems to make guardianship not one of the pillars of marriage in accordance with the Hanafiyah opinion. It appears that Algeria attempted to adopt all of the scholarly opinions in the Family Code 1984. Research implications/limitations – Looking at the modern realities in the two Muslim countries, it is appropriate to make reforms to guardianship regulations that prioritize gender equality.

Legitima Jurnal Hukum Keluarga IslamVol. 6(2)
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gender and Women's Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.