Implicit gender stereotypes in STEM: measuring cognitive bias and group differences through reaction times

Closing the gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines is essential for achieving social equity and advancing innovation and socioeconomic development, as outlined in the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. Despite notable progress, persistent stereotypes continue to restrict women’s aspirations and limit their access to traditionally male-dominated STEM careers, thereby influencing their social cognition and decision-making. This study examines implicit gender–career biases among STEM students by analyzing reaction times (RTs) from the implicit association test (IAT) while investigating how these biases vary across sexes and gender identities, with particular attention to their disproportionate impact on women. A quantitative, cross-sectional experimental design was employed. The IAT was administered with blocks 3 and 4 representing stereotype‐consistent tasks and blocks 6 and 7 representing stereotype‐inconsistent tasks. In the sex-based analysis, participants classified as female exhibited significant differences between blocks 3 vs. 6 (p < 0.001) and blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001), whereas those classified as male showed a significant difference only between blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001). In the gender-based analysis, respondents who self-identified as women demonstrated significant differences between blocks 3 vs. 6 (p = 0.001) and blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001), while participants who self-identified as men exhibited a significant difference only for blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001). Non-binary participants showed significant differences for both comparisons, blocks 3 vs. 6 (p = 0.004) and blocks 4 vs. 7 (p = 0.049). In contrast, individuals reporting other gender identities exhibited a significant difference only between blocks 4 vs. 7 (p = 0.015). The findings reveal that implicit gender–career associations disproportionately affect both individuals classified as female and those identifying as women or non-binary, shaping their perceptions and attitudes toward STEM. This underscores the urgent need for targeted educational interventions to mitigate these biases and promote gender equity in higher education. Addressing these cognitive barriers can enable institutions to enhance the retention and success of underrepresented groups, ultimately harnessing the full potential of diverse talent in STEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of STEM Education
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00541-7
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit gender stereotypes in STEM: measuring cognitive bias and group differences through reaction times

Francisca Beroíza‐Valenzuela
6 citations
International Journal of STEM Education
Social and Intergroup Psychology
25.21
article

Implicit gender stereotypes in STEM: measuring cognitive bias and group differences through reaction times

Francisca Beroíza‐Valenzuela
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Closing the gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines is essential for achieving social equity and advancing innovation and socioeconomic development, as outlined in the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. Despite notable progress, persistent stereotypes continue to restrict women’s aspirations and limit their access to traditionally male-dominated STEM careers, thereby influencing their social cognition and decision-making. This study examines implicit gender–career biases among STEM students by analyzing reaction times (RTs) from the implicit association test (IAT) while investigating how these biases vary across sexes and gender identities, with particular attention to their disproportionate impact on women. A quantitative, cross-sectional experimental design was employed. The IAT was administered with blocks 3 and 4 representing stereotype‐consistent tasks and blocks 6 and 7 representing stereotype‐inconsistent tasks. In the sex-based analysis, participants classified as female exhibited significant differences between blocks 3 vs. 6 (p < 0.001) and blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001), whereas those classified as male showed a significant difference only between blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001). In the gender-based analysis, respondents who self-identified as women demonstrated significant differences between blocks 3 vs. 6 (p = 0.001) and blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001), while participants who self-identified as men exhibited a significant difference only for blocks 4 vs. 7 (p < 0.001). Non-binary participants showed significant differences for both comparisons, blocks 3 vs. 6 (p = 0.004) and blocks 4 vs. 7 (p = 0.049). In contrast, individuals reporting other gender identities exhibited a significant difference only between blocks 4 vs. 7 (p = 0.015). The findings reveal that implicit gender–career associations disproportionately affect both individuals classified as female and those identifying as women or non-binary, shaping their perceptions and attitudes toward STEM. This underscores the urgent need for targeted educational interventions to mitigate these biases and promote gender equity in higher education. Addressing these cognitive barriers can enable institutions to enhance the retention and success of underrepresented groups, ultimately harnessing the full potential of diverse talent in STEM.

International Journal of STEM EducationVol. 12(1)
Centro de Estudios Científicos (CL)
Universidad de Chile, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Directorate for STEM Education
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.