A Comparative Study of Chinese and Japanese Classical Poetry Collections in the 8th-9th Centuries: A Trans-East Asian Approach
This study examines classical Chinese and Japanese poetry collections (漢詩選集) from the 8th and 9th centuries through a trans-East Asian perspective, employing digital humanities methodologies. By analyzing four representative collections from each country, it investigates the criteria for selection and the distinctive characteristics of these anthologies, highlighting both their commonalities and differences. The findings reveal the multilayered and interactive dynamics of East Asian literary culture.In China, the compilation of poetry collections was primarily guided by an intent to reinforce literary traditions and propagate Confucian values, reflecting a focus on personal emotions and ethical ideals. Conversely, Japanese anthologies exhibited unique arrangement styles, emphasizing natural imagery and aristocratic culture, as part of an effort to construct a distinct literary identity while adapting influences from Chinese literature and thought. These differences illustrate the divergent approaches to inclusion and organization between the two countries.By integrating digital humanities methodologies, this study systematically maps patterns of literary interaction and verifies processes of tradition and transformation within East Asian literature. The analysis underscores Japan’s selective adaptation of Chinese cultural elements to align with its socio-political and aesthetic contexts, resulting in compilations with distinctly different intentions and significance.This research contributes to understanding the criteria, significance, and characteristics of classical poetry anthologies from a trans-East Asian perspective, offering new insights into the interwoven literary traditions of the region.
Authors
- Joonyoun Kim
- Nuri Na
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Chinese Studies
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.35982/jcs.111.7
- Primary Topic
- Chinese history and philosophy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00