Building a collective economy, but for whom? ‘Three conversions’ and rural revitalization in China

The recent campaign to build a rural collective economy in China has been perceived as a major policy shift. This paper shows, however, that the policy outcome deviates significantly from building a genuine inclusive collective economy. The main measure that the Chinese state implemented to strengthen rural collectives under the new policy initiative has been to convert village resources, funds, and people into marketable assets, shares, and shareholders, known as ‘Three Conversions’ reform. Our fieldwork in a pilot village selected for implementing the policy shows that the newly established collective economy is not inclusive for all villagers. Rather, the policy empowered rural cadres and private investors, who have increased their control of village resources for personal gains, whereas ordinary villagers are increasingly detached and excluded from access to farmland and other village resources. As a result, instead of building an inclusive collective economy, the Three Conversions reform has facilitated the rise of state-led agrarian capitalism in rural China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2025.2476004
Citations
3
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a collective economy, but for whom? ‘Three conversions’ and rural revitalization in China

Shaohua Zhan, Xingyan Chen
3 citations
The Journal of Peasant Studies
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
article

Building a collective economy, but for whom? ‘Three conversions’ and rural revitalization in China

Shaohua Zhan, Xingyan Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The recent campaign to build a rural collective economy in China has been perceived as a major policy shift. This paper shows, however, that the policy outcome deviates significantly from building a genuine inclusive collective economy. The main measure that the Chinese state implemented to strengthen rural collectives under the new policy initiative has been to convert village resources, funds, and people into marketable assets, shares, and shareholders, known as ‘Three Conversions’ reform. Our fieldwork in a pilot village selected for implementing the policy shows that the newly established collective economy is not inclusive for all villagers. Rather, the policy empowered rural cadres and private investors, who have increased their control of village resources for personal gains, whereas ordinary villagers are increasingly detached and excluded from access to farmland and other village resources. As a result, instead of building an inclusive collective economy, the Three Conversions reform has facilitated the rise of state-led agrarian capitalism in rural China.

The Journal of Peasant StudiesVol. 53(1)
Nanyang Technological University (SG), China Agricultural University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.