On the Error Metrics Used for Direction of Arrival Estimation

In this article, the error metrics used for evaluating the performance of direction of arrival (DoA) estimation are thoroughly investigated to recommend the most suitable one. This investigation highlights the lack of consensus in the literature regarding the selection and definition of these metrics. We show that this disparity is particularly serious in 2D DoA estimation, an aspect often overlooked by many authors. Notably, certain widely accepted error metrics can yield inaccurate and misleading results. Therefore, this article advocates for the adoption of a specific error metric that ensures accurate and meaningful assessments of 2D DoA estimation. A set of numerical and experimental results is presented to demonstrate the potential of the proposed error metric compared to other well-known metrics. Unlike other metrics, our proposed error definition is frame-independent. Finally, practical use cases are briefly discussed to highlight the pervasive impact of this fundamental definition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082358
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Error Metrics Used for Direction of Arrival Estimation

Giuseppe Giammello, Mohammad Abdul Hannan, Ottavio Crisafulli, Gino Sorbello
4 citations
Sensors
Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
5.94
article

On the Error Metrics Used for Direction of Arrival Estimation

Giuseppe Giammello, Mohammad Abdul Hannan, Ottavio Crisafulli, Gino Sorbello
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this article, the error metrics used for evaluating the performance of direction of arrival (DoA) estimation are thoroughly investigated to recommend the most suitable one. This investigation highlights the lack of consensus in the literature regarding the selection and definition of these metrics. We show that this disparity is particularly serious in 2D DoA estimation, an aspect often overlooked by many authors. Notably, certain widely accepted error metrics can yield inaccurate and misleading results. Therefore, this article advocates for the adoption of a specific error metric that ensures accurate and meaningful assessments of 2D DoA estimation. A set of numerical and experimental results is presented to demonstrate the potential of the proposed error metric compared to other well-known metrics. Unlike other metrics, our proposed error definition is frame-independent. Finally, practical use cases are briefly discussed to highlight the pervasive impact of this fundamental definition.

SensorsVol. 25(8)
University of Catania (IT), Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Telecomunicazioni (IT), University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
5.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Error Metrics Used for Direction of Arrival Estimation — Giuseppe Giammello, Mohammad Abdul Hannan, et al. · Sensors (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS