Comparison of Smart Bands with MEMS and Motion Tracking Systems Used in Running

This research utilizes a self-developed inertial sensor in conjunction with a motion tracking system and four Smart Bands to record a runner's movements and extract parameters such as step numbers, length, and frequencies at different running speeds. The data obtained were processed to find the number of steps taken. These steps were also recorded by an IMU (inertial measurement unit) and motion tracking system (MoCap-Motion Capturing) and used to compare the different systems and find their agreement at different running speeds. The results show a very strong correlation between the IMU and the motion tracking system with r<sup>2</sup> = 0.968 at 6 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.991 at 8 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.991 at 10 km/h, and r<sup>2</sup> = 0.996 at 12 km/h. The Xiaomi Mi Band 2 showed an r<sup>2</sup> = 0.861 at 6 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.985 at 8 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.977 at 10 km/h, and r<sup>2</sup> = 0.987 at 12 km/h and can therefore be considered a good replacement for an IMU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082354
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Smart Bands with MEMS and Motion Tracking Systems Used in Running

Andy Stamm, Ronny Hartanto, Noah Becker
3 links
Sensors
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Comparison of Smart Bands with MEMS and Motion Tracking Systems Used in Running

Andy Stamm, Ronny Hartanto, Noah Becker
article en

Abstract

This research utilizes a self-developed inertial sensor in conjunction with a motion tracking system and four Smart Bands to record a runner's movements and extract parameters such as step numbers, length, and frequencies at different running speeds. The data obtained were processed to find the number of steps taken. These steps were also recorded by an IMU (inertial measurement unit) and motion tracking system (MoCap-Motion Capturing) and used to compare the different systems and find their agreement at different running speeds. The results show a very strong correlation between the IMU and the motion tracking system with r<sup>2</sup> = 0.968 at 6 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.991 at 8 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.991 at 10 km/h, and r<sup>2</sup> = 0.996 at 12 km/h. The Xiaomi Mi Band 2 showed an r<sup>2</sup> = 0.861 at 6 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.985 at 8 km/h, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.977 at 10 km/h, and r<sup>2</sup> = 0.987 at 12 km/h and can therefore be considered a good replacement for an IMU.

SensorsVol. 25(8)
Griffith University (AU), Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Smart Bands with MEMS and Motion Tracking Systems Used in Running — Andy Stamm, Ronny Hartanto, et al. · Sensors (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS