On the value of context in engineering mathematics problems: students’ perspectives

Abstract Engineering mathematics students are typically presented with mathematical techniques illustrated by examples set in context in order to motivate them and develop them as engineers. It is perhaps surprising, therefore, that a study by Klymchuk & Spooner (2020, Teach. Math. Appl., 39, 29–37) found engineering students preferred to be taught via problems without context. Following a critique of that study, a survey, focused solely on (non-)context-related problems, is designed to examine engineering students’ preferences and opinions about context in mathematical problems. A total of 170 first-year engineering students from a range of engineering disciplines at one university were presented with examples of equivalent contextual and non-contextual problems and asked questions about solving these. Results suggest students have no strong preference for either contextual or non-contextual problems. Some prefer the relative ease of abstract problem solving without context, while a context provides a welcome link between mathematics and engineering and the ability to visualize a problem. Most students reported finding contextual problems more difficult to solve. Few students reported being motivated by the context, with some confusion related to notation, terminology and units. Students indicated a strong preference for context to align to their chosen engineering discipline over context from a different engineering discipline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hraf004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Programs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the value of context in engineering mathematics problems: students’ perspectives

Peter Rowlett, Alexandra Shukie, Patrick Johnson
1 citations
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA
Mathematics Education and Programs
1.37
article

On the value of context in engineering mathematics problems: students’ perspectives

Peter Rowlett, Alexandra Shukie, Patrick Johnson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Engineering mathematics students are typically presented with mathematical techniques illustrated by examples set in context in order to motivate them and develop them as engineers. It is perhaps surprising, therefore, that a study by Klymchuk & Spooner (2020, Teach. Math. Appl., 39, 29–37) found engineering students preferred to be taught via problems without context. Following a critique of that study, a survey, focused solely on (non-)context-related problems, is designed to examine engineering students’ preferences and opinions about context in mathematical problems. A total of 170 first-year engineering students from a range of engineering disciplines at one university were presented with examples of equivalent contextual and non-contextual problems and asked questions about solving these. Results suggest students have no strong preference for either contextual or non-contextual problems. Some prefer the relative ease of abstract problem solving without context, while a context provides a welcome link between mathematics and engineering and the ability to visualize a problem. Most students reported finding contextual problems more difficult to solve. Few students reported being motivated by the context, with some confusion related to notation, terminology and units. Students indicated a strong preference for context to align to their chosen engineering discipline over context from a different engineering discipline.

Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMAVol. 44(4)
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Mathematics Education and Programs
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.