The Minimal Important Difference of the Thai Version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Thai Short Form 36 Version 2 Among Patients with Shoulder Pain

Objective: The present study aimed to determine the minimal important difference (MID) of the Thai version of the shoulder pain and disability index (Thai SPADI) and the bodily pain subscale of the thai short form 36 version 2 (Thai SF36v2-BP) among patients with shoulder pain.Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted. Participants with unilateral shoulder pain were assessed using the Thai SPADI and the Thai SF36v2-BP at the baseline and follow-up sessions. Using an anchor-based approach, the MID value was the mean difference in value between the minimal improvement group and the no change group.Results: Of 92 participants, 70 (76%) were diagnosed with myofascial pain, 53 (58%) had pain>6 months. Additionally, the number of participants whose symptoms had undergone deterioration, no change, minimal improvement, and marked improvement were 4, 13, 32, and 43, respectively. The MID (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the total Thai SPADI scale was 10.1 (0.7 to 19.5), while the MID (95% CI) for the Thai SF36v2-BP was 3.1 (-7.2 to 13.5).Conclusion: In patients with shoulder pain, the Thai SPADI had more sensitivity to minimal clinical improvement than the Thai SF36v2-BP.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20251185
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Minimal Important Difference of the Thai Version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Thai Short Form 36 Version 2 Among Patients with Shoulder Pain

Chanwit Phongamwong, Thakorn Tawatkiratipol
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

The Minimal Important Difference of the Thai Version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Bodily Pain Subscale of the Thai Short Form 36 Version 2 Among Patients with Shoulder Pain

Chanwit Phongamwong, Thakorn Tawatkiratipol
article en

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to determine the minimal important difference (MID) of the Thai version of the shoulder pain and disability index (Thai SPADI) and the bodily pain subscale of the thai short form 36 version 2 (Thai SF36v2-BP) among patients with shoulder pain.Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted. Participants with unilateral shoulder pain were assessed using the Thai SPADI and the Thai SF36v2-BP at the baseline and follow-up sessions. Using an anchor-based approach, the MID value was the mean difference in value between the minimal improvement group and the no change group.Results: Of 92 participants, 70 (76%) were diagnosed with myofascial pain, 53 (58%) had pain>6 months. Additionally, the number of participants whose symptoms had undergone deterioration, no change, minimal improvement, and marked improvement were 4, 13, 32, and 43, respectively. The MID (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the total Thai SPADI scale was 10.1 (0.7 to 19.5), while the MID (95% CI) for the Thai SF36v2-BP was 3.1 (-7.2 to 13.5).Conclusion: In patients with shoulder pain, the Thai SPADI had more sensitivity to minimal clinical improvement than the Thai SF36v2-BP.

Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.