On non-reformist reforms and partial political settlements in degrowth strategy

One of the most urgent and challenging open questions for degrowth scholarship and practice concerns how to pursue a degrowth social-ecological transformation within the existing structures in the real world. However, the marked emphasis on democratic planning for non-reformist reforms in a degrowth strategy (i) underestimates the lack of favourable conditions for democratic planning (i.e., political support, the willingness and ability of the state to act, and a condition of broad accord in society), (ii) reflects a problematic lack of preparedness for strategic compromise, and (iii) conflates non-reformist reforms with consensus-based deliberative democracy and policy and planning. This paper explores ‘partial political settlements’ as a perspective on transformative non-reformist reforms in unfavourable conditions to address these shortcomings. The paper illustrates the approach through the examples of the Representation of the People Act (United Kingdom), and the National Policy for Agroecology and Organic Production (Brazil). The partial settlements perspective aligns with an emancipatory interpretation of non-reformist reforms, complements prefiguration and counterhegemonic mobilisation and offers an alternative pathway to deliberative democratic planning for non-reformist reforms for social-ecological transformation. • The paper addresses degrowth transformation from within existing real-world structures. • ‘Partial political settlements’ perspective may support non-reformist reforms in unfavourable conditions. • The perspective aligns with an emancipatory perspective on non-reformist reforms. • The perspective is an alternative to deliberative democratic planning for non-reformist reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108613
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On non-reformist reforms and partial political settlements in degrowth strategy

Giuseppe Feola
5 citations
Ecological Economics
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
21.01
article

On non-reformist reforms and partial political settlements in degrowth strategy

Giuseppe Feola
article en
5 citations

Abstract

One of the most urgent and challenging open questions for degrowth scholarship and practice concerns how to pursue a degrowth social-ecological transformation within the existing structures in the real world. However, the marked emphasis on democratic planning for non-reformist reforms in a degrowth strategy (i) underestimates the lack of favourable conditions for democratic planning (i.e., political support, the willingness and ability of the state to act, and a condition of broad accord in society), (ii) reflects a problematic lack of preparedness for strategic compromise, and (iii) conflates non-reformist reforms with consensus-based deliberative democracy and policy and planning. This paper explores ‘partial political settlements’ as a perspective on transformative non-reformist reforms in unfavourable conditions to address these shortcomings. The paper illustrates the approach through the examples of the Representation of the People Act (United Kingdom), and the National Policy for Agroecology and Organic Production (Brazil). The partial settlements perspective aligns with an emancipatory interpretation of non-reformist reforms, complements prefiguration and counterhegemonic mobilisation and offers an alternative pathway to deliberative democratic planning for non-reformist reforms for social-ecological transformation. • The paper addresses degrowth transformation from within existing real-world structures. • ‘Partial political settlements’ perspective may support non-reformist reforms in unfavourable conditions. • The perspective aligns with an emancipatory perspective on non-reformist reforms. • The perspective is an alternative to deliberative democratic planning for non-reformist reforms.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 235
Utrecht University (NL), Institute for Sustainable Development (SI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.