DTL versus skin electrodes in recording of multifocal pattern electroretinogram and multifocal photopic negative response
mfPERG & mfERG<sub>PhNR</sub> traces were similar for E<sub>DTL</sub> and E<sub>SKIN</sub>. However, for skin electrodes, amplitudes and SNRs were lower and peak times shorter. E<sub>SKIN</sub> thus seem to be a viable alternative in patients in whom the use of corneal electrodes is precluded, e.g., children and disabled patients, but at the expense of SNR and with reference to E<sub>SKIN</sub> normative data.
Authors
- Khaldoon O. Al-Nosairy
- Michael B. Hoffmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6452-9638)
- Henrike Marie Nowitzki
Institutions
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Documenta Ophthalmologica
- Published
- 2025-04-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10014-5
- Primary Topic
- Retinal Development and Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg