Contribution of Extracranial Injuries to GOSE Scores after Traumatic Brain Injury TBI: A TRACK-Traumatic Brain Injury Study

The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) is the most widely used outcome measure for hospital-based studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The GOSE may be administered several ways, the choice depending on the purpose of the research. In this investigation, we evaluated the effect of administering the GOSE to collect functional disability attributed to all injuries sustained (GOSE-All) or excluding the impact of extracranial injuries (GOSE-TBI). We examined the differences in reported disability between the two administration methods at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after injury. Data are summarized from 2288 individuals who were enrolled in the prospective observational Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) cohort study. The distribution of scores is summarized by time after injury, brain injury severity, and extracranial injury severity. Dichotomizing the GOSE varying ways, differences in the prevalence of unfavorable outcomes for GOSE-All versus GOSE-TBI range from none to 42 percentage points. Discrepancies in disability captured by GOSE-All and GOSE-TBI decrease with greater TBI severity, no serious extracranial injuries, and longer time post-injury. It is important for researchers, given the aims of their studies, to decide in advance whether GOSE classification should be based on the effects of all injuries sustained or excluding the effects of extracranial injuries so as to emphasize the effects of the brain injury, as well as how disability due to emotional consequences of injury and other circumstances will be scored. Instructions to the respondent and outcomes examiner need to be clear about what causes of disability are to be included. The TBI Common Data Elements should include information that reflects the method that was used to collect the GOSE data and data repositories should disclose which data collection method was used for a given study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0421
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contribution of Extracranial Injuries to GOSE Scores after Traumatic Brain Injury TBI: A TRACK-Traumatic Brain Injury Study

Jason Barber, Lindsay D. Nelson, Kim Boase, Michael McCrea et al.
8 citations
Journal of Neurotrauma
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
10.83
article

Contribution of Extracranial Injuries to GOSE Scores after Traumatic Brain Injury TBI: A TRACK-Traumatic Brain Injury Study

Jason Barber, Lindsay D. Nelson, Kim Boase, Michael McCrea, Yelena G. Bodien, Joseph T. Giacino, Gabriela Sugar, Molly Rose Morrissey, Nancy Temkin, Claudia Sue Robertson, Dan Joseph Stein, Geoffrey T. Manley, Sabrina S. Taylor, Joan Machamer, Evan Zahniser, David O. Okonkwo, Sureyya Dikmen
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) is the most widely used outcome measure for hospital-based studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The GOSE may be administered several ways, the choice depending on the purpose of the research. In this investigation, we evaluated the effect of administering the GOSE to collect functional disability attributed to all injuries sustained (GOSE-All) or excluding the impact of extracranial injuries (GOSE-TBI). We examined the differences in reported disability between the two administration methods at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after injury. Data are summarized from 2288 individuals who were enrolled in the prospective observational Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) cohort study. The distribution of scores is summarized by time after injury, brain injury severity, and extracranial injury severity. Dichotomizing the GOSE varying ways, differences in the prevalence of unfavorable outcomes for GOSE-All versus GOSE-TBI range from none to 42 percentage points. Discrepancies in disability captured by GOSE-All and GOSE-TBI decrease with greater TBI severity, no serious extracranial injuries, and longer time post-injury. It is important for researchers, given the aims of their studies, to decide in advance whether GOSE classification should be based on the effects of all injuries sustained or excluding the effects of extracranial injuries so as to emphasize the effects of the brain injury, as well as how disability due to emotional consequences of injury and other circumstances will be scored. Instructions to the respondent and outcomes examiner need to be clear about what causes of disability are to be included. The TBI Common Data Elements should include information that reflects the method that was used to collect the GOSE data and data repositories should disclose which data collection method was used for a given study.

Journal of NeurotraumaVol. 42(17-18)
Harvard University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Brain Injury Association of America (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US), Neurological Surgery (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
10.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.