Публичный правопорядок в контексте конституционных поправок 2020 года

The reason for writing this article was the adoption in 2020 of the Law of the Russian Federation on Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which amended Article 125 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, concerning the enshrinement at the constitutional level of the term “fundamentals of public law and order”. In this regard, the article addresses such issues of the institution of public order as the absolute uncertainty of the term, the lack of uniformity in judicial practice and the increasingly broad interpretation of the concept of “public order”. As a result, it is concluded that the term “fundamentals of public order” is more acceptable, since what is referred to as public order in judicial practice actually constitutes its foundations (principles of Russian law, morality and ethics, etc.), an opinion is expressed about the need to unify terminology, using constitutional terms in sectoral legislation, as well as the need for constitutional enshrinement of the protection of public order as a general principle, while it is necessary to limit the “scope” for judicial discretion by enshrining the concept of public order and its foundations at the legislative level, since the institution of public order is of fundamental importance and its interpretation should not be unlimited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Demidovskij ûridičeskij žurnal.
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18255/2306-5648-2025-1-20-31
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Публичный правопорядок в контексте конституционных поправок 2020 года

Сергей Петрович Казанков
1 citations
Demidovskij ûridičeskij žurnal.
Legal and Policy Issues
15.98
article

Публичный правопорядок в контексте конституционных поправок 2020 года

Сергей Петрович Казанков
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The reason for writing this article was the adoption in 2020 of the Law of the Russian Federation on Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which amended Article 125 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, concerning the enshrinement at the constitutional level of the term “fundamentals of public law and order”. In this regard, the article addresses such issues of the institution of public order as the absolute uncertainty of the term, the lack of uniformity in judicial practice and the increasingly broad interpretation of the concept of “public order”. As a result, it is concluded that the term “fundamentals of public order” is more acceptable, since what is referred to as public order in judicial practice actually constitutes its foundations (principles of Russian law, morality and ethics, etc.), an opinion is expressed about the need to unify terminology, using constitutional terms in sectoral legislation, as well as the need for constitutional enshrinement of the protection of public order as a general principle, while it is necessary to limit the “scope” for judicial discretion by enshrining the concept of public order and its foundations at the legislative level, since the institution of public order is of fundamental importance and its interpretation should not be unlimited.

Demidovskij ûridičeskij žurnal.Vol. 15(1)
Yaroslavl State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal and Policy Issues
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.