Get on with and Continue with: Similarity Analysis

This article provides an in-depth similarity analysis of the phrases get on with and continue with using data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the British National Corpus (BNC), and ChatGPT. A key finding is that in COCA, the two phrases share a 33.33% similarity in ranking analysis, whereas in BNC, their similarity is 0%. In COCA, get on with is most similar to continue with in the newspaper genre and least similar in TV/movies. Conversely, in BNC, their closest similarity occurs in magazines and their greatest divergence in fiction. Standard deviation analysis further highlights differences in frequency. In COCA, get on with has a standard deviation of 294.02, indicating a frequency range of 199.48 to 787.52, while continue with has a standard deviation of 194.4, with a range of 163.98 to 552.78. Although their frequency correlation is not statistically significant, COCA shows a weak positive correlation, while BNC reveals a weak negative correlation. Notably, in neither corpus does the frequency of get on with significantly affect continue with. Additionally, eight of their top 20 collocations overlap, reflecting a 40% similarity in usage. Overall, the findings suggest minimal similarity between these phrases, with clear distinctions between American and British English. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how phrase usage varies across different linguistic and cultural contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8764
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Get on with and Continue with: Similarity Analysis

Hyewon Cho, Nam-Kil Kang
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Get on with and Continue with: Similarity Analysis

Hyewon Cho, Nam-Kil Kang
article en

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth similarity analysis of the phrases get on with and continue with using data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the British National Corpus (BNC), and ChatGPT. A key finding is that in COCA, the two phrases share a 33.33% similarity in ranking analysis, whereas in BNC, their similarity is 0%. In COCA, get on with is most similar to continue with in the newspaper genre and least similar in TV/movies. Conversely, in BNC, their closest similarity occurs in magazines and their greatest divergence in fiction. Standard deviation analysis further highlights differences in frequency. In COCA, get on with has a standard deviation of 294.02, indicating a frequency range of 199.48 to 787.52, while continue with has a standard deviation of 194.4, with a range of 163.98 to 552.78. Although their frequency correlation is not statistically significant, COCA shows a weak positive correlation, while BNC reveals a weak negative correlation. Notably, in neither corpus does the frequency of get on with significantly affect continue with. Additionally, eight of their top 20 collocations overlap, reflecting a 40% similarity in usage. Overall, the findings suggest minimal similarity between these phrases, with clear distinctions between American and British English. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how phrase usage varies across different linguistic and cultural contexts.

Forum for Linguistic Studies
Far East University (KR)
Far East University
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Get on with and Continue with: Similarity Analysis — Hyewon Cho, Nam-Kil Kang · Forum for Linguistic Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS