Quality of carcass and meat from young bulls of different genetic groups previously supplemented on pasture during the rainy season and finished in a feedlot

This study aimed to evaluate the carcass and meat quality of young bulls from different genetic groups supplemented on pasture during the rainy season and finished in a feedlot. The experiment was conducted in 2014, lasting 224 days, in Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil. The evaluated genetic groups were ½Brangus½Nellore, Nellore, and ½Canchim½Nellore. The animals underwent two experimental phases: in the first phase, they received mineral and mineral-energy supplementation on pasture; in the second phase, they were finished in a feedlot, where the residual effect of supplementation on carcass and meat quality was evaluated. ½Brangus½Nellore animals showed increases in slaughter weight of 48.40 and 44.60 kg compared to Nellore and ½Canchim½Nellore, respectively. Mineral-energy supplementation resulted in increased carcass weight and special cuts. The highest marbling score was obtained for ½Canchim½Nellore animals. However, in the meat chemical composition, no effects of genetic groups and supplementation were observed. Thus, despite the lower carcass weight and lower marbling degree, Nellore breed, when receiving mineral supplementation, shows greater potential for meat production in tropical climate regions, as it produces meat with similar quality to other genetic groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Animal Research
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2025.2489498
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Biological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of carcass and meat from young bulls of different genetic groups previously supplemented on pasture during the rainy season and finished in a feedlot

Tiago do Prado Paim, Elis Aparecido Bento, Patrick Bezerra Fernandes, João Paulo Ferreira Rufino et al.
Journal of Applied Animal Research
Agriculture and Biological Studies
article

Quality of carcass and meat from young bulls of different genetic groups previously supplemented on pasture during the rainy season and finished in a feedlot

Tiago do Prado Paim, Elis Aparecido Bento, Patrick Bezerra Fernandes, João Paulo Ferreira Rufino, Abílio Paulo Changule, João Restle, George Vieira do Nascimento, Francisco Ribeiro de Araújo Neto, Tiago Pereira Guimarães, A. F. F. dos Santos, Ubirajara Oliveira Bilego
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the carcass and meat quality of young bulls from different genetic groups supplemented on pasture during the rainy season and finished in a feedlot. The experiment was conducted in 2014, lasting 224 days, in Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil. The evaluated genetic groups were ½Brangus½Nellore, Nellore, and ½Canchim½Nellore. The animals underwent two experimental phases: in the first phase, they received mineral and mineral-energy supplementation on pasture; in the second phase, they were finished in a feedlot, where the residual effect of supplementation on carcass and meat quality was evaluated. ½Brangus½Nellore animals showed increases in slaughter weight of 48.40 and 44.60 kg compared to Nellore and ½Canchim½Nellore, respectively. Mineral-energy supplementation resulted in increased carcass weight and special cuts. The highest marbling score was obtained for ½Canchim½Nellore animals. However, in the meat chemical composition, no effects of genetic groups and supplementation were observed. Thus, despite the lower carcass weight and lower marbling degree, Nellore breed, when receiving mineral supplementation, shows greater potential for meat production in tropical climate regions, as it produces meat with similar quality to other genetic groups.

Journal of Applied Animal ResearchVol. 53(1)
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), Instituto Federal Goiano (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Agriculture and Biological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.