Evaluation of Axial Performance of CFST Columns Filled with Ultra-High-Performance Concrete and Different Cross-Sectional Shapes

In this research, an analysis of the influence of the cross-section on CFST columns built with ultra-high-performance concrete was carried out. For this purpose, numerical simulations were performed on columns using three types of cross sections: circular, square, and octagonal. The study analyzes the impact of steel yield strength, concrete compressive strength, lateral pressure, and confining stress. The results show that as the yield strength of steel increases, the maximum axial load capacity of the columns increases. The trends reveal 7.46%, 4.47%, and 5.75% increases in the maximum axial load capacity for columns with circular, square, and octagonal cross-sections. Similarly, 16.85%, 9.39%, and 36.59% increases in lateral pressure were observed for the different section types. In general, columns with square sections have greater capacity to support axial loads, with increases of 11.42% and 23.98% compared to circular and octagonal sections. In addition, the compressive strength of concrete considerably influences the maximum axial load-carrying capacity of CFST columns. The results show that an increase in this property generates an increase of 19.55%, 22.86%, and 23.29% in the maximum axial load capacity for columns with circular, square, and octagonal sections. In general, the methodology used is a tool to analyze the axial load capacity of CFST columns, considering the mechanical properties of steel and concrete and the geometry of the cross-section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE)
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15866/irece.v15i6.25251
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Axial Performance of CFST Columns Filled with Ultra-High-Performance Concrete and Different Cross-Sectional Shapes

Marlen Fonseca Vigoya, Carlos Pardo García, Jhon Antuny Pabón
4 links
International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE)
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Evaluation of Axial Performance of CFST Columns Filled with Ultra-High-Performance Concrete and Different Cross-Sectional Shapes

Marlen Fonseca Vigoya, Carlos Pardo García, Jhon Antuny Pabón
article en

Abstract

In this research, an analysis of the influence of the cross-section on CFST columns built with ultra-high-performance concrete was carried out. For this purpose, numerical simulations were performed on columns using three types of cross sections: circular, square, and octagonal. The study analyzes the impact of steel yield strength, concrete compressive strength, lateral pressure, and confining stress. The results show that as the yield strength of steel increases, the maximum axial load capacity of the columns increases. The trends reveal 7.46%, 4.47%, and 5.75% increases in the maximum axial load capacity for columns with circular, square, and octagonal cross-sections. Similarly, 16.85%, 9.39%, and 36.59% increases in lateral pressure were observed for the different section types. In general, columns with square sections have greater capacity to support axial loads, with increases of 11.42% and 23.98% compared to circular and octagonal sections. In addition, the compressive strength of concrete considerably influences the maximum axial load-carrying capacity of CFST columns. The results show that an increase in this property generates an increase of 19.55%, 22.86%, and 23.29% in the maximum axial load capacity for columns with circular, square, and octagonal sections. In general, the methodology used is a tool to analyze the axial load capacity of CFST columns, considering the mechanical properties of steel and concrete and the geometry of the cross-section.

International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE)Vol. 15(6)
Francisco de Paula Santander University (CO)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.