Analysis of <scp>PM<sub>2.5</sub></scp> Morphology, Composition and Health Risk in a Multi‐Chair Dental Clinic

Particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) at high concentrations in dental clinics poses significant health risks to healthcare professionals. However, the morphology and chemical composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in specific environments are not yet fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the concentration, morphology, chemical composition, and health assessment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> collected in a multi-chair dental clinic in Shanghai, China. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to observe the morphology and elemental composition of indoor and outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Chemicals were measured for their concentrations using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). In the dental clinic, the indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration ranged from 2.01 to 114.59 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, with a mean of 23.31 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, while the outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration ranged from 2.88 to 157.4 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, with a mean of 30.98 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Indoor particles showed more rough, irregular mineralization, which was confirmed as the dominant elements of Ca, P, Si, and zirconia (Zr) by EDS. The average concentrations of Ca, P, Cu, Sr, and Sb indoors were lower than those outdoors (p < 0.05). We also found that Cd, As, and Ni exceeded the annual limits of the Ambient Air Quality Standards of WHO. For the health assessment, the carcinogenic risks of Cd, As, and Cr were higher than the minimum acceptable level (1 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), with values of 3.68 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, 1.10 × 10,<sup>-5</sup> and 5.52 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, respectively, and the non-carcinogenic risk of Cd was the highest, as illustrated by the Hazard Quotient of 2.04. These findings indicate that dental healthcare professionals may be exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> containing high concentrations of toxic metals and carcinogenic elements over the long term. This study highlights the importance of protective measures (e.g., the adoption of efficient air purification systems) to minimize the risk of particle inhalation for both patients and professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.24519
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of PM2.5 Morphology, Composition and Health Risk in a Multi‐Chair Dental Clinic

Guotao Peng, Yuanzhi Xu, Fubo Chen, Guangwei Shang et al.
3 citations
Environmental Toxicology
Air Quality and Health Impacts
3.60
article

Analysis of PM2.5 Morphology, Composition and Health Risk in a Multi‐Chair Dental Clinic

Guotao Peng, Yuanzhi Xu, Fubo Chen, Guangwei Shang, Jing Cai, Shengcai Qi, Xueyun Wen, Fengqin Tang, Yiming Zhang, Xu Zhang, Xiaoshan Tang, Jieying Huang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) at high concentrations in dental clinics poses significant health risks to healthcare professionals. However, the morphology and chemical composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in specific environments are not yet fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the concentration, morphology, chemical composition, and health assessment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> collected in a multi-chair dental clinic in Shanghai, China. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to observe the morphology and elemental composition of indoor and outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Chemicals were measured for their concentrations using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). In the dental clinic, the indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration ranged from 2.01 to 114.59 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, with a mean of 23.31 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, while the outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration ranged from 2.88 to 157.4 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, with a mean of 30.98 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Indoor particles showed more rough, irregular mineralization, which was confirmed as the dominant elements of Ca, P, Si, and zirconia (Zr) by EDS. The average concentrations of Ca, P, Cu, Sr, and Sb indoors were lower than those outdoors (p < 0.05). We also found that Cd, As, and Ni exceeded the annual limits of the Ambient Air Quality Standards of WHO. For the health assessment, the carcinogenic risks of Cd, As, and Cr were higher than the minimum acceptable level (1 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), with values of 3.68 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, 1.10 × 10,<sup>-5</sup> and 5.52 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, respectively, and the non-carcinogenic risk of Cd was the highest, as illustrated by the Hazard Quotient of 2.04. These findings indicate that dental healthcare professionals may be exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> containing high concentrations of toxic metals and carcinogenic elements over the long term. This study highlights the importance of protective measures (e.g., the adoption of efficient air purification systems) to minimize the risk of particle inhalation for both patients and professionals.

Environmental ToxicologyVol. 40(10)
Tongji University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Shanghai Stomatological Hospital (CN), Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN)
Tongji University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.