Pressure–Flow Relation of Porcine Thoracic Duct Segment

The lymphatic system collects excess fluid and molecules from the interstitial space back into the venous system mainly via the thoracic duct (TD). Despite the importance of the lymphatic flow in health and disease, a validated pressure-flow relation of lymphatic fluid through the TD is lacking in a translational large animal model. The objective of this work was to establish a pressure-flow relationship for a TD segment with one valve in a swine model. Our methodology consisted of using a specialized bench experimental setup to measure the passive forward flow of 0.9% saline through single-valve TD segments (<i>n</i> = 5) under various pressure gradients. Using Poiseuille's law, we computed the resistance to flow in the TD segment. Subsequently, we used a sigmoidal function to model the relation between valve resistance and pressure gradient across the valve. We estimated the model's parameters using the Poiseuille-based resistance values and associated experimental pressure date then validated the model by comparing model predictions of flow to experimental measurements. We found that the model performs accurately (R2=0.985±0.010). The resistance model validated here for a single valve TD segment provides a fundamental element for computational simulations of lymphatic flow in the entire TD. Moreover, this work provides a baseline for future characterization of TD behavior under pathological conditions, such as congestive heart failure or hepatitis caused ascites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040401
Primary Topic
Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure–Flow Relation of Porcine Thoracic Duct Segment

Joshua Krieger, Jillian N. Noblet, Max Itkin, Aashish Ahuja et al.
Bioengineering
Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
article

Pressure–Flow Relation of Porcine Thoracic Duct Segment

Joshua Krieger, Jillian N. Noblet, Max Itkin, Aashish Ahuja, Ghassan S. Kassab, Sean Chambers, Xiao Lu, Bhavesh Patel
article en

Abstract

The lymphatic system collects excess fluid and molecules from the interstitial space back into the venous system mainly via the thoracic duct (TD). Despite the importance of the lymphatic flow in health and disease, a validated pressure-flow relation of lymphatic fluid through the TD is lacking in a translational large animal model. The objective of this work was to establish a pressure-flow relationship for a TD segment with one valve in a swine model. Our methodology consisted of using a specialized bench experimental setup to measure the passive forward flow of 0.9% saline through single-valve TD segments (<i>n</i> = 5) under various pressure gradients. Using Poiseuille's law, we computed the resistance to flow in the TD segment. Subsequently, we used a sigmoidal function to model the relation between valve resistance and pressure gradient across the valve. We estimated the model's parameters using the Poiseuille-based resistance values and associated experimental pressure date then validated the model by comparing model predictions of flow to experimental measurements. We found that the model performs accurately (R2=0.985±0.010). The resistance model validated here for a single valve TD segment provides a fundamental element for computational simulations of lymphatic flow in the entire TD. Moreover, this work provides a baseline for future characterization of TD behavior under pathological conditions, such as congestive heart failure or hepatitis caused ascites.

BioengineeringVol. 12(4)
California Medical Innovations Institute (US), Cook Medical (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Cook Medical
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.